More
    Home Blog Page 54

    Is it Time to Create the World Football Agents Union?


    Introduction

    In a time where football agents are now subjected to new FIFA Football Agent Regulations and have been under public scrutiny in recent times for the volume of money that is seen to be leaving the game, perhaps the most straightforward solution to these issues is for agents to establish themselves as a major stakeholder within the beautiful game. 

    To become a stakeholder, this simply means that agents would form a group or union that has a vested interest in the decision-making processes and organisation of the world’s biggest sport. An agent’s union could form as an independent stakeholder in direct contact with the other major stakeholders in football, such as FIFA and the ECA, in order to ensure that the voices of agents are heard and represented throughout the world of football. 

    This blog will consider the stakeholders within football in the current landscape and how the development of a group of agents as an official stakeholding member of the football community could produce significant benefits for the improvement of the game and the industry as a whole.

    Current Major Stakeholders

                 To explain how agents could unite together and position themselves as stakeholders in football, let’s look at the other major stakeholders in the current modern game:

    1. FIFA: This is the most well-known and widely spoken about stakeholder in football. FIFA is the primary governing body that passes rules and regulations aimed at developing and improving that game of football internationally. It is also one of the longest standing stakeholders, having been founded in 1904 and has overseen international competitions and association football ever since.
    2. FIFPRO: Perhaps better known as the stakeholder acting on behalf of the football players themselves. FIFPRO’s objective is to defend and uphold the rights of players and put forward their concerns, issues and opinions on certain matters in football to benefit their interests. FIFPRO is an international stakeholder, formed by many separate national player unions that collate areas and policies that impact players and express how they believe they should be amended or adopted positively for players.
    3. ECA: The European Club Association takes on a similar role to FIFPRO but instead acts on behalf of the association football clubs within the UEFA confederation of Europe. It was only relatively recently formed in 2008 but has established itself as the main voice recognised by FIFA and UEFA as being responsible for advocating for the wellbeing and interests of European football clubs. 

    These organisations are examples of how stakeholders form and what exactly the roles and responsibilities of being a stakeholder are. 

    Agents as Stakeholders

    In the current climate, despite having a significant impact on football, FIFA does not formally recognise agents as major stakeholders in football. Unions of agents do exist but not in a manner which is purposeful or beneficial for agents internationally.

    Currently, FIFA does not recognise agents as stakeholders as there is no unity between agents nor a properly structured ‘single umbrella’ of agents. This is an advantage for FIFA’s position of power and allowed them to create their own agent group. The current FIFA Agent Platform or “Working Group” is the only “representative body” recognised by FIFA that may appear to be made up of “agents”. FIFA describes its role as a permanent consultative body for agents. However, it is not the kind of beneficial and desirable union that agents are seeking to express their opinions formally and effectively. The group is made up of 18 individuals and is realistically an extension of FIFA and is organised and financed by FIFA itself, failing to truly represent the interests of agents but rather the interests of FIFA. A body created and maintained by FIFA cannot possibly objectively promote the interests of agents.

    Organisations such as the Professional Football Agents Association exist and PROFAA was actually the union named by FIFA within their “consultation process” regarding the new football agent regulations. However, much like the agent working group, the association is not accurately representative of the agent landscape. In fact, it represents around 0.1% of agents globally. Many of the individuals that are part of PROFAA are not actually practising agents and represent a very small minority of the reality. There needs to be a more accurate representative global union that acts as a body protecting the best interests of agents.

    Similarly, satellite unions are forming in other countries such as the Association of Football Agents (AFA) in England which have taken on the responsibility of heading the legal case against FIFA over the new regulations. Despite such an approach, the union is still not formally recognised by FIFA and is unable to be representative of agents internationally. Other examples of smaller unions yet to manage to emerge and establish themselves as an independent stakeholder recognised by FIFA include the European Football Agents Association (EFAA), and The Football Forum, set up by some of the most well-known individuals in football agency. There are also agent associations in countries such as Germany, Switzerland and Brazil. However, these unions are not formally organised or majorly actively collaborating with FIFA directly and are primarily focused on legal opposition against the new regulations.

    Our belief is that, in light of the new regulations and legal proceedings against them, now is the time for agents to unite and for the establishment of a globally recognised and officially approved agents body that acts as a major stakeholder within football. Perhaps forming something along the lines of a “World Football Agents Union”. 

    Currently, agents are subject to the arbitration and regulation of FIFA who may divide and rule as they see fit, without formally recognised resistance from an agent union. Perhaps only once such a position as a stakeholder is adopted by agents, will the profession receive adequate respect and authority in voicing concerns and opposing unfair regulation and circumstances. 

    The best way to launch such a union would be to create a formal platform which outlines its own regulations, board and organisation and takes on members first. The next step would be to increase in size and begin to collaborate with FIFA working towards various improvements to the agency profession. After this work, there is the chance to become recognised formally as an independent stakeholder.

    By bringing global agents under a single global umbrella as a stakeholder will provide a stable platform and foundation for agents to improve not only their own industry but also the football landscape in its entirety. A union creates a robust and unified force that can aim for a universally consistent goal of improving the agent industry such as establishing appropriate regulations with FIFA. 

    Importantly, the unified agent body must be truly representative of agents across the world unlike the current FIFA Working Group. In other words, the voices of top agents as well as smaller agencies must be able to be heard and represented. In this way, it ensures that all regulations and conduct of agents internationally can be considered and adapted in order to create a beneficial and ethical landscape for every agent operating in the industry.

    Clearly there would be many benefits for agents becoming recognised stakeholders in football. It is necessary for agents to be able to safeguard and promote their own well-being within an industry they play such a pivotal role within. It is unfair and counter-productive that a profession which influences transfers and financial transactions so prominently in the sport are not treated with appropriate diligence and respect and granted the platform to express how the agent industry may best be overseen and regulated. 

    Summary

    Being a stakeholder within the game of football is a straightforward way of ensuring that whichever party or group of individuals are being represented have the necessary influence and impact to protect themselves and advance their interests to benefit the sport as a whole. Therefore, it seems undeniable that agents should be given an equal position and should act as major stakeholders in football to reflect the work that they do and the impact that they have.

    Update: Rechtsfälle gegen die neuen FIFA Spielervermittler-Regularien 

    Einleitung

    In einem unserer vorherigen Blogbeiträge haben wir die rechtlichen Verfahren im Zusammenhang mit dem neuen FIFA Spielervermittler-Reglement besprochen. Wir thematisierten dabei die Rechtsgrundlage der Fälle, mögliche Entwicklungen, die Maßnahmen der FIFA, mögliche Ergebnisse und die umfassenderen Auswirkungen auf Spielerberater und den Sport selbst.

    Seitdem wurden in wichtigen Gerichtsverfahren in verschiedenen Gerichtsbarkeiten erhebliche Fortschritte erzielt. Nationale Gerichte haben vorläufige Entscheidungen erlassen, während sie auf ein endgültiges Urteil höherer europäischer Gerichte warten, was ein langwieriger Prozess werden könnte. In diesem Blogbeitrag werden wir einen aktualisierten Überblick über die Rechtsfälle geben.

    Rechtliche Grundlage

    Die Spielervermittler argumentieren, dass bestimmte Aspekte der Vorschriften inkohärent seien und im Widerspruch zum europäischen und nationalen Recht stünden, was sie ungültig und nicht durchsetzbar mache. Die FIFA muss lokale und internationale Gesetze einhalten, und wenn dies nicht gegeben ist, könnten ihre Vorschriften außer Kraft gesetzt werden. Die wesentlichen Rechtsgründe für den Rechtsstreit gegen die FIFA sind folgende:

    • Wettbewerbsrecht: Spielerberater behaupten, dass die FIFA-Bestimmungen gegen das europäische Wettbewerbsrecht verstoßen, indem sie ein wettbewerbswidriges Business schaffen. Insbesondere die Provisionsobergrenze schränkt die Geschäftstätigkeit der Vermittler im Wettbewerb ein und begünstigt größere Agenturen, was möglicherweise zu einer Monopolisierung der Branche führt. Die Vermittler argumentieren, dass dies eine illegale Handelsbeschränkung sei und ihre Verdienstmöglichkeiten beschränke.
    • Machtmissbrauch: Die FIFA hat als Dachverband die Macht, weltweit Regeln aufzustellen und zu ändern. Das Verfahren gegen die FIFA zielt darauf ab, zu beweisen, dass sie ihre marktbeherrschende Stellung durch die Einführung von Vorschriften missbraucht hat, die Interessengruppen missachten, den Wettbewerb auf dem Markt schädigen und sich negativ auf die Branche auswirken. Spelerberater argumentieren, dass die Versuche der FIFA, sich mit Spielervermittlern zu beraten, unzureichend waren.
    • Angemessenheit, Verhältnismäßigkeit und Erfolgsaussichten: Die FIFA hat die neuen Vorschriften eingeführt, um die Transparenz in der Beraterbranche zu verbessern und den Geldabfluss aus dem Spiel zu verringern. In den Klagen gegen die FIFA wird jedoch geltend gemacht, dass die Regelungen in ihrer derzeitigen Fassung weder angemessen, verhältnismäßig noch geeignet seien, die Ziele der FIFA zu erreichen. Spielerberater argumentieren, dass die Zahlungslast auf die Spieler und nicht auf die Vereine verlagert wird und dass die Vorschriften keine transparentere und ethischere Branche schaffen werden.

    Diese Punkte bilden die Grundlage des laufenden Streits gegen das Spieervermittler-Reglement der FIFA.

    Vor den Gerichten werden mehrere rechtliche Fragen im Zusammenhang mit den neuen FIFA-Bestimmungen und der Verpflichtung für Spielervermittler geprüft, ihre Einkünfte öffentlich über die FIFA-Clearingstelle bekannt zu geben. Vermittler haben Bedenken hinsichtlich möglicher Verletzungen der Privatsphäre und der damit verbundenen Sicherheitsrisiken geäußert, insbesondere in bestimmten Regionen der Welt. Sie hoffen, dass die Gerichte diese Argumente als triftige Gründe für die Anfechtung dieses Aspekts der Vorschriften anerkennen.

    Einige Teile des neuen FIFA Spielervermittler-Reglements, insbesondere die Provisionsobergrenze, sind nach Ansicht der Agenten ungerecht. Wenn die Vorschriften letztendlich von den Gerichten als gültig erachtet werden, könnten Spielerberater, die nicht zu den Spitzenverdienern gehören, Schwierigkeiten haben, ihre Geschäfte aufrechtzuerhalten. Das würde zu erheblichen Konsequenzen für Spieler in unteren Ligen und die gesamte Fußballlandschaft führen. Der alleinige Nachweis der „Ungerechtigkeit“ reicht jedoch oft nicht aus. Die in verschiedenen globalen Gerichtsbarkeiten vorgebrachten Rechtsfälle beruhen auf der Vorlage von Beweisen und gut formulierten Argumenten, die zeigen, wie die Vorschriften nationale und internationale Gesetze untergraben.

    Was ist bisher passiert?

    Wie bereits erwähnt, haben die Spielervermittler auf die neuen FIFA Spielervermittler-Regularien reagiert, indem sie sich zusammenschlossen und einen kollektiven Ansatz initiierten, um die Bestimmungen weltweit vor Gerichten anzufechten und sowohl finanzielle als auch soziale Unterstützung für den Aufbau überzeugender Rechtsfälle zu suchen. Diese Fälle wurden durch nationale und internationale Rechtssysteme, einschließlich nationaler Gerichte und des Schiedsgerichts für Sport, verhandelt.

    In Deutschland ist bereits ein bedeutendes Urteil zugunsten von Spielerberatern gefallen. Ein nationales Gericht hat eine einstweilige Verfügung erlassen, die die Umsetzung und Durchsetzung des FIFA Spielervermittler-Reglements bis zu einer endgültigen Entscheidung des Europäischen Gerichtshofs (EuGH) verhindert. Während die endgültige Entscheidung einige Zeit in Anspruch nehmen kann, spiegelt das Urteil des deutschen Gerichts Bedenken wider, dass die neuen Vorschriften die Grundsätze der Wettbewerbsfähigkeit untergraben. Dies ist eine positive Entwicklung für die Spielervermittler und stellt die FIFA vor Herausforderungen, da deren Regelungen in Deutschland nicht durchgesetzt werden können. Die einstweilige Verfügung gilt jedoch derzeit nur im deutschen Rechtsraum.

    In den Niederlanden fällte das Zentralgericht ein anderes Urteil. Das Gericht räumte zwar ein, dass die Entscheidung des EuGH abgewartet werden muss, um ein endgültiges und allgemein verbindliches Urteil zu erhalten, verlangte jedoch von der European Football Agents Association und den Pro Agent-Gruppen die Zahlung der Anwaltskosten für das Verfahren. Zudem lehnte es den Erlass einer einstweiligen Verfügung ab. Dies deutet darauf hin, dass der endgültige Ausgang des Gerichtsverfahrens ungewiss ist und die Spielervermittler nicht von einem garantierten Erfolg in ihrem Fall gegen die FIFA ausgehen können.

    Der Internationale Sportgerichtshof (CAS) wird voraussichtlich bis Ende Juli ein Urteil fällen, in dem es insbesondere um die Vereinbarkeit des FIFA Spielervermittler-Regularien mit materiellem EU-Recht geht. Dieses Urteil wird für den Ausgang des Rechtsstreits von entscheidender Bedeutung sein.

    Das bestmögliche Ergebnis

    Im Allgemeinen streben Spielervermittler keine vollständige Immunität gegenüber Regulierungen an, sondern unterstützen vielmehr die Idee neuer Branchenvorschriften, die die Qualität und ethischen Standards in ihrem Beruf verbessern können. Sie erkennen die positiven Aspekte wie den Lizenzierungsprozess und ein allgemeingültiges Lizenzsystem an, die als Eintrittsbarrieren wirken. Sie äußern jedoch Bedenken hinsichtlich der Fairness, Praktikabilität und rechtlichen Auswirkungen bestimmter Aspekte des neuen FIFA-Reglements.

    Ziel der gerichtlichen Anfechtung der FIFA ist es, den Berufsstand der Agenturen zu schützen und zu argumentieren, dass die aktuellen Regelungen ungerecht und rechtlich problematisch und daher nicht durchsetzbar seien. Das Ziel besteht nicht darin, eine völlige Deregulierung zu erreichen, sondern vielmehr darin, machbare, vernünftige und praktische Regelungen zu schaffen. Die Hoffnung besteht darin, dass internationale Gerichte die FIFA anweisen, ihre Vorschriften zu ändern, was zu einem Kompromiss führt, der die Transparenz in der Agentur- und Fußballbranche fördert, ohne nachteilige Folgen für den Sport und den Lebensunterhalt der Beteiligten, insbesondere der Spieler.

    Zusammenfassung

    Die Gerichtsurteile zu den neuen FIFA-Reglementen haben zu erheblicher Unsicherheit hinsichtlich ihrer Rechtsgültigkeit und Durchsetzbarkeit geführt. Nationale Gerichte haben unterschiedliche Meinungen geäußert, sind sich jedoch einig, dass sie auf umfassende Entscheidungen des Europäischen Gerichtshofs und des Schiedsgerichts für Sport warten. Auch weitere Fälle in Ländern wie England, Belgien und der Schweiz werden voraussichtlich zu wichtigen Entscheidungen führen. Bis der Europäische Gerichtshof ein endgültiges Urteil fällt und keine einstweiligen Verfügungen erlassen werden, werden die FIFA-Regularien in vielen Ländern weiterhin angewendet und durchgesetzt. Eine laufende Beobachtung der Situation ist notwendig.

    An Update on the Legal Case Against the New FIFA Football Agent Regulations


    Introduction

    In our previous blog on the legal proceedings around the new FIFA Football Agent Regulations we outlined the legal basis of the cases, how they may develop, FIFA’s defences, possible outcomes and the wider effect it may have upon football agents and football itself. 

    Since then, there have been significant developments in major court cases in different jurisdictions and preliminary decisions have been made by national courts whilst an overall judgement from the higher European courts is still ongoing and may take any length of time. In this blog we will revisit the background of the legal cases as well as explaining the conclusions that have been drawn so far and the impact these decisions could have on the final outcome. 

    The Legal Basis

    To remind you as to why there is such a legal dispute over the new FIFA Football Agent Regulations, the foundations of these proceedings relies on the facts that agents strongly believe that there are areas of the new regulations that are incoherent and contradictory to wider areas of European and National Law and hence, they should be deemed invalid and unenforceable. FIFA are not immune or excused from local and international laws and the new agent regulations must be compliant and compatible with these legal systems. Within the legal proceedings against FIFA, it must be shown that this is the case or the risk is that FIFA’s regulations will be dismissed and declared unenforceable.

    For the purpose of explaining the decisions made so far, let’s revisit the fundamental legal grounds for the dispute against FIFA:

    1. Competition Law? Agents and their legal representatives have argued that FIFA have breached European Competition Law and that it is facilitating an anti-competitive industry. The commission cap is the biggest contradiction against Competition Law as it prevents agents conducting their business competitively against other agents. Smaller agents and agencies will be unable to financially maintain themselves against larger agencies and the industry will become monopolised by a select few large agencies. Furthermore, this could also be an illegal restriction of trade and limits the earning potential of agents.
    2. Abuse of Dominance? FIFA are the governing body that makes, amends and removes rules and regulations within the sport and across the world, their regulations are implemented on a national level. The case against FIFA has set out to show that the dominant organisation (FIFA) has abused their position. For it to be said that the regulations are an ‘abuse’ of their position in the football industry, the cases have aimed to argue that the new agent regulations were created without a regard for impacted stakeholders, are damaging to market competition as well as to the general well-being of the industry. Additionally, the agents’ case is trying to prove that any alleged attempts of FIFA to avoid abuse of dominance, such as the “consultation” process they conducted with agents, were futile.
    3. Reasonableness, Proportionality and Chance of Success? FIFA has implemented the new agent regulations in the hope of achieving an overall improvement to the agent industry and to football in general. This has arisen following widespread criticism of a lack of transparency in the agency industry and the significant outflow of money out of the game as clubs pay large commission sums. The cases against FIFA are aiming to successfully show that the new regulations, as they currently are, are not reasonable, proportionate, nor stand a tangible chance of achieving the aims of FIFA. For example, a reasonably expected consequence of the new regulations is that agents and clubs will find different methods of paying agents ethically, and if not, it is the player that is burdened rather than the clubs. Hence, if courts conclude that the regulations are therefore unlikely to achieve their aims of creating a more transparent and ethical industry, then it is possible that the FIFA Regulations will not be upheld.

    There are then several legal issues that are being considered in the courts surrounding the aspect of the new regulations and the FIFA Clearing House requiring agents to publicly declare their earnings. The concerns around this are not only based on the right to privacy of agents but also the dangers this may present to agents in certain parts of the world. Agents hope that courts will consider breaches to privacy and an effect on the safety of agents to be a valid argument against this part of the new regulations. 

    Ultimately, agents feel as though at least some parts of the new FIFA agent regulations, particularly the commission cap, are unfair. If the regulations were to be ultimately upheld as valid by the courts, agents that aren’t in the top bracket of earners are likely to be driven out of business and this could have drastic consequences for players in lower leagues and the wider football landscape. However, ‘unfairness’ is often not enough, the cases brought to different legal systems globally are relying upon evidence and well thought-out arguments that the regulations undermine national and international laws.

    What has happened so far?

    As we discussed previously, the reaction of agents was one of unity with many agent ‘unions’ coming together to initiate a mass approach against the new FIFA Football Agent Regulations in the hope of gathering strong enough financial and social support to bring a robust and successful case to courts across the world. 

    The cases are gradually ascending through the national and international legal systems. Many proceedings began in national courts such as in the Netherlands, Belgium, Germany and beyond. However, cases are also ongoing and are being heard in courts such as the Court of Arbitration for Sports. 

    In Germany, the national court has already passed a significant ruling in favour of the case of football agents. After a German Agency sued against the German Football Association (DFB), an injunction has been issued by the national court ordering that the FIFA Football Agent Regulations are not to be implemented or enforced until a final ruling is given by the European Court of Justice which the case had previously been escalated to although this final decision may take a long period of time to be concluded. This follows from the ruling in the Mainz District Court referring their ruling on the regulations to the European Court of Justice back in April and encouraging the consideration of a temporary injunction. 

    The Dortmund-based German Court have now reiterated that they agreed with the legal objections that the new regulations undermined the principles of competitiveness in common law. This is a positive preliminary outcome for agents and perhaps gives an indication as to how the major courts are likely to resolve the case. It is also a point of concern for FIFA who will now be unable to enforce their previously ‘universal’ laws in Germany. The injunction, for now, is only within the German jurisdiction but may complicate matters such as international transfers in and out of Germany in the summer window if the regulations are enforceable in the other relevant country. 

    In a separate case, the Netherlands Central Court, although also acknowledging the need to wait for the decision of the highest European Court (the ECJ) before a conclusive and universally binding ruling is given, offered a slightly different verdict from the Dortmund court. The court demanded that the European Football Agents Association and Pro Agent groups pay the legal fees due for the proceedings and denied that an injunction would be a suitable solution in the circumstances. Perhaps this gives the impression that the final outcome of the court proceedings is not a foregone conclusion and agents cannot be complacent in believing their case against FIFA will be successful.

    It is expected that the Court of Arbitration for sport (CAS) will provide a ruling by the end of July this year, specifically addressing the compatibility of the FIFA Football Agent Regulations with substantive EU law.

    The Best Possible Outcome

    In general, many agents are supportive of the concept of new industry regulations, particularly if they would be successful in improving the quality of those in the industry as well as increased ethical behaviours. Hence, it is assumed that agents do not want to achieve complete immunity from regulation as a result of challenging the new Regulations in court. Aspects such as the exam and a formal, universally applicable licensing system are positive barriers to entry into the industry, whilst other aspects raise points of discussion around fairness and practicality, as well as legal connotations. In reality, the aim of battling against FIFA is to protect the agency profession and ensure that the allegedly unfair and legally problematic regulations that are currently being implemented are deemed to be unenforceable. 

    Instead of total deregulation, the desired outcome is for feasible, reasonable and practical regulations. The hope is that under the rulings of international courts, FIFA will be legally ordered to amend their new regulations. The best possible outcome is to find a ‘middle-ground’ compromise that still achieves the enhanced transparency in the agency and football industries but does not have damaging consequences for the game as a whole and for the livelihoods of working professionals, especially for players.

    Summary

    The most obvious conclusion that can be drawn from the court rulings that have arisen so far is that there is a considerable degree of uncertainty, even within national courts, as to whether the new regulations ought to be deemed legally invalid and unenforceable. 

    The common ground of both cases so far is that national courts are waiting for the decisions of the European Court of Justice as well as the Court of Arbitration for Sport to give a more comprehensive and universally-applicable ruling. There are also expected to be significant decisions and rulings given as a result of additional cases proceeding in England, Belgium and Switzerland. However, until the higher European Court of Justice provides a definitive conclusion as the final say and preliminary injunctions are not instated, the FFAR will be applied and enforced in many countries. We will continue to monitor this!

    Guía Completa Explicando los Términos y Definiciones Clave Utilizados por la FIFA en los documentos de Estudio del Examen para Aspirantes a Agentes de Fútbol 

    Introducción

    Para aprobar el Examen de Agente de Fútbol de la FIFA, los candidatos deben aprenderse todas las reglas, regulaciones, políticas y pautas contenidas en los Materiales de Estudio de la FIFA. Sin embargo, el aspecto fundamental del aprendizaje de estas regulaciones es primero comprender la terminología que utiliza la FIFA a lo largo del documento. En todas las cláusulas relevantes, es difícil comprender lo que le están diciendo a menos que sepa la definición de cada término y abreviatura.

    Al comienzo de cada Documento de la FIFA se describen las definiciones de los términos clave. Este blog proporciona una lista completa de la A a la Z de todas las definiciones que necesita saber al hacer el Examen de Agente de Fútbol de la FIFA y dónde encontrarlas dentro de los materiales de estudio de la FIFA. En cada definición también hemos subrayado las ideas principales para ayudar a su aprendizaje.

    A-Z de la Terminología de la FIFA

    Clave:

    RFAF: Reglamento de la FIFA Sobre Agentes de Fútbol

    RCCF: Reglamento de la Cámara de Compensación de la FIFA

    RETJ: Reglamento Sobre el Estatuto y la Transferencia de Jugadores de la FIFA

    Estatutos: Estatutos de la FIFA

    COE FIFA: Código de Ética de la FIFA

    TERMINODOCDEFINICION
    AcademiaRFAF & RETJOrganización o entidad jurídicamente independiente, cuyo objetivo principal es formar deportivamente y a largo plazo a jugadores, mediante la puesta a disposición de instalaciones e infraestructura adecuadas. El término incluye, entre otros, los centros de formación para futbolistas, los campamentos de fútbol, las escuelas de fútbol, etc.
    AgenciaRFAFOrganización, entidad, bufete o empresa privada compuesta por uno o más agentes de fútbol, que los contrate o emplee, o que actúe de alguna manera como vehículo para los asuntos comerciales en su actividad.
    Declaración de AsignaciónRCCFEl documento emitido por la secretaría general de la FIFA a la Cámara de Compensación de la FIFA que le proporciona la información necesaria para procesar los pagos, en particular, las partes pagadoras y receptoras y los montos a distribuir.
    ContactoRFAF(i) todo contacto en persona o por medios electrónicos con un cliente; (ii) todo contacto directo o indirecto con una persona u organización vinculada o relacionada con el cliente, como un familiar o amigo; o (iii) toda acción llevada a cabo por un tercero o una organización en nombre de un agente de fútbol para contactar con un cliente según lo descrito en los apdos. (i) y (ii) de está definición. 
    FederaciónEstatutosAsociación de fútbol reconocida como tal por la FIFA. Es miembro de la FIFA, salvo que el contexto evidencie otro significado.
    Fútbol AsociaciónEstatutosDeporte regido por la FIFA y organizado por la FIFA, las confederaciones y las federaciones miembro de acuerdo con las Reglas de Juego.
    Federaciones BritánicasEstatutoslas cuatro federaciones del Reino Unido, la Federación Inglesa de Fútbol, la Federación Escocesa de Fútbol, la Federación Galesa de Fútbol y la Federación Irlandesa de Fútbol (Irlanda del Norte).
    Bureau del ConsejoEstatutosÓrgano definido en el art. 38 de los presentes Estatutos
    Transferencia PuenteRETJDos transferencias consecutivas del mismo jugador (nacionales o internacionales) vinculadas entre sí y con una inscripción de ese jugador en un club intermedio para evitar la aplicación de la reglamentación o legislación pertinente y/o con el objeto de defraudar a otras personas o entidades.
    ClienteRFAFFederación miembro, club, jugador, entrenador o liga jurídicamente independiente que contrate los servicios de representación de un agente de fútbol.
    ClubEstatutosMiembro de una federación (a su vez, miembro de la FIFA) o de una liga reconocida por una federación miembro que aporta al menos un equipo al campeonato.
    Jugador Formado por un ClubRETJJugador que, entre las edades de 15 (o el comienzo de la temporada en la que cumple 15 años) y 21 años (o el final de la temporada en la que cumple 21 años), e independientemente de su nacionalidad y edad, estuvo inscrito en su club actual durante un periodo, continuo o no, de tres temporadas completas o de 36 meses.
    EntrenadorRETJPersona empleada por un club profesional o asociación que desempeña una labor específica del fútbol y:i. cuyas obligaciones laborales consisten en una o más de las siguientes: entrenar a jugadores, seleccionar a jugadores para partidos y competiciones, tomar decisiones tácticas durante los partidos y competiciones; oii. cuyo empleo requiere estar en posesión de una licencia de entrenador conforme a la normativa nacional o continental de licencias
    Periodo de CompetenciaRETJEl período que comienza con el primer partido oficial del campeonato de liga nacional o de la competencia de copa nacional, lo que ocurra primero, y termina con el último partido oficial jugado dentro de esas competencias.
    Evaluación del CumplimientoRCCFEl procedimiento que debe realizar la Cámara de Compensación de la FIFA antes de aceptar a cualquier cliente potencial para cumplir con los requisitos reglamentarios financieros
    ConfederaciónEstatutosAgrupación de federaciones reconocidas por la FIFA que pertenecen al mismo continente (o espacio geográfico similar).
    CongresoEstatutosÓrgano legislativo e instancia suprema de la FIFA.
    ConsejoEstatutosÓrgano estratégico y supervisor de la FIFA.
    PaísEstatutosTodo estado independiente reconocido por la comunidad internacional.
    Agente de Fútbol VinculadoRFAFUn agente de fútbol puede estar vinculado a otro agente de fútbol en virtud de: (i) ser empleados o tener un contrato de colaboración con la misma agencia a través de la cual prestan servicios de representación; (ii) ser ambos directores, accionistas o copropietarios de la misma agencia a través de la cual prestan servicios de representación; (iii) estar casados, ser pareja de hecho, hermanos, o padre e hijo o hijastro; o (iv) haber alcanzado un acuerdo mutuo u otro tipo de acuerdo, formal o informal, para colaborar, en más de una ocasión, en el ejercicio de la actividad o compartir los ingresos o beneficios de cualquiera de sus servicios de representación.
    Cámara de Resolución de DisputasRCCFLa Cámara de Resolución de Disputas del Tribunal de Fútbol tal como se define en las Reglas de Procedimiento
    Declaración de DistribuciónRCCFEl documento generado por la Cámara de Compensación de la FIFA que contiene información sobre los pagos de premios de formación a los que tiene derecho el club o clubes formadores en cuestión.
    Sistema Electrónico de Transferencias Nacionales:RETJSistema informático en línea capaz de administrar y supervisar todas las transferencias nacionales de una asociación, conforme a los principios del modelo implementado en el ámbito internacionala través del sistema de correlación de transferencias (v. anexo 3). Este sistema deberá, como mínimo, recopilar el nombre completo, género, nacionalidad, fecha de nacimiento y FIFA ID del jugador, su estatus (aficionado o profesional, conforme al art. 2, apdo. 2 del presente reglamento), el nombre y la FIFA ID de los dos clubes implicados en la transferencia nacional, así como los pagos entre los clubes, si procede. El sistema electrónico de transferencias nacionales deberá estar integrado con el sistema electrónico de registro de la asociación y con la Interfaz de FIFA Connect, a fin de intercambiar información electrónicamente.
    Pasaporte Deportivo ElectrónicoRETJDocumento electrónico que contiene información consolidada de la inscripción de un jugadora lo largo de su carrera, incluida la federación miembro correspondiente, su estatus (aficionado o profesional), el tipo de inscripción (permanente o préstamo) y el club o los clubes (incluida la categoría de formación) en los que ha estado inscrito desde el año natural en que cumplió 12 años.
    Sistema Electrónico de Registro de JugadoresRETJSistema informático en línea en elque se registra la inscripción de todos los jugadores de una asociación. El sistema electrónico de registro de jugadores deberá estar integrado con el SistemaFIFA Connect ID y la Interfaz de FIFA Connect, a fin de intercambiar información electrónicamente. El sistema electrónico de registro de jugadores deberá suministrar todos los datos de inscripción de todos los jugadores con edad a partir de 12 años a través de la Interfaz de FIFA Connect y, en concreto, deberá asignar a cada jugador una FIFA ID utilizando el Servicio de FIFA Connect ID.
    Fútbol de Once JugadoresRETJFútbol que se disputa de acuerdo con las Reglas del Juego de la FIFA, promulgadas por el International Football Association Board.
    Entidad de DestinoRFAFClub, federación miembro o liga jurídicamente independiente que desee contratar los servicios de un jugador o entrenador.
    Comisión de ÉticaCOE FIFALas referencias a la Comisión de Ética en el presente código comprenden el órgano de instrucción y el órgano de decisión.
    Términos y Condiciones CCFRCCFLos términos y condiciones para que una parte participe en una transacción que involucre a la Cámara de Compensación de la FIFA.
    FIFAEstatutosFédération Internationale de Football Association.
    Cámara de Compensación de la FIFARETJEntidad que actúa como intermediaria en relación con el procesamiento de determinados pagos efectuados en el sistema de transferencias del fútbol.
    Servicio FIFA Connect IDRETJServicio proporcionado por la FIFA que asigna identificadores únicos con validez global (FIFA ID) a personas, organizaciones e instalaciones. En caso de un segundo registro de la misma entidad, alerta sobre el duplicado y mantiene un registro central con las fichas de todas las entidades que disponen de un FIFA ID.
    Interfaz de FIFA ConnectRETJInterfaz técnica facilitada por la FIFA en el marco del Programa FIFA Connect, empleada en el intercambio electrónico de mensajes cifrados de extremo a extremo entre las asociaciones miembro y entre las asociaciones miembro y la FIFA.
    Eventos de la FIFACOE FIFACualquier evento, incluidos, pero no exclusivamente, el Congreso de la FIFA, sesiones del Consejo o de las comisiones, las competiciones de la FIFA y cualquier otro acto que recaiga dentro de las competencias de la FIFA o esté organizado por esta.
    FIFA IDRETJIdentificación única en el ámbito mundial que asigna el Servicio FIFA Connect ID a cada club, asociación y jugador.
    Primera Evaluación de CumplimientoRCCFEl primer paso en el proceso de la Cámara de Compensación de la FIFA para realizar una evaluación de cumplimiento para una transacción específica.
    Agente de FútbolRFAFPersona física con licencia de la FIFA para prestar servicios de representación. 
    Servicios de RepresentaciónRFAFServicio relacionado con el fútbol llevado a cabo para o en representación de un cliente, incluida toda negociación y comunicación informativa o preparatoria, u otras actividades afines, realizada con el objetivo y/o la intención de completar una transacción.
    PersonaRFAFJugador o entrenador
    InterésRFAF(i) toda propiedad efectiva de una persona jurídica por la que se ejerce la actividad relevante de las entidades correspondientes, a excepción de la afiliación personal de carácter ordinario, no transferible y de libre acceso que dé derecho al titular de la misma a un voto único en los asuntos de un club; y (ii) estar en una posición desde la que se pueda ejercer una influencia material, financiera, comercial, administrativa, de gestión o de cualquier otro tipo sobre los asuntos de una persona física o jurídica, ya sea directa o indirectamente y de manera formal o informal.
    Asociación AnteriorRETJLa asociación en la que el club anterior está afiliado.
    Club AnteriorRETJEl club que el jugador abandona.
    FutsalRETJFútbol que se disputa de acuerdo con las Reglas de Juego del Futsal de la FIFA, que han sido elaboradas por la FIFA en colaboración con la Subcomisión del International Football Association Board.
    IFABEstatutosInternational Football Association Board.
    Transferencia InternacionalRETJTraslado de la inscripción de un jugador de una asociación a otra asociación.
    Reglas del JuegoEstatutosNormativa rectora del fútbol asociación promulgada por el IFAB de conformidad con el art. 7 de los presentes Estatutos.
    LigaEstatutosOrganización subordinada a una federación.
    Agente Organizador de PartidosCOE FIFAPersona jurídica o física con licencia de la FIFA para organizar partidos, conforme a la reglamentación de la FIFA pertinente.
    Excepción de CorrelaciónRETJEstado de una transferencia internacional que consta en el TMS cuando ambos clubes han introducido correctamente la información básica (jugador, clubes y orden de transferencia) pero todavía quedan ciertos datos (datos del pago o fechas del préstamo) que no se corresponden entre ambas órdenes de transferencia. Este error de correlación impide que la transferencia avance.
    Baja por MaternidadRETJPeriodo de descanso laboral retribuido de 14 semanas como mínimo que se concede a una jugadora en caso de quedarse embarazada. Como mínimo, ocho de estas semanas deberán tener lugar tras dar a luz.
    Federación MiembroEstatutosFederación admitida en la FIFA por el Congreso.
    Jugadores Menores de EdadRETJJugadores que aún no han cumplido 18 años.
    Transferencia NacionalRETJEl traslado de la inscripción nacional de un jugador en una asociación de un club a otro dentro de la misma asociación.
    Nueva AsociaciónRETJLa asociación a la que está afiliado el nuevo club.
    Nuevo ClubRETJEl club al que cambia el jugador.
    Parte IncumplidaRCCFUn cliente de la Cámara de Compensación de la FIFA que no pasa una Primera Evaluación de Cumplimiento y/o una Segunda Evaluación de Cumplimiento.
    OficialEstatutos & COE FIFATodo miembro de una junta (incluidos los del Consejo) o comisión, árbitro y árbitro asistente, gerente deportivo, entrenadoro cualquier otro responsable técnico, médico o administrativo dela FIFA en una confederación, federación miembro, liga o club, así como todos aquellos obligados a cumplir con los Estatutos de la FIFA (excepto los jugadores, agentes de fútbol y agentes organizadores de partidos).
    Competición OficialEstatutosTorneo de selecciones organizado por la FIFA o por una confederación.
    Partidos OficialesRETJPartidos jugados en el ámbito del fútbol organizado, tales como los campeonatos nacionales de liga, las copas nacionales y los campeonatos internacionales de clubes, con excepción de los partidos de prueba y los partidos amistosos.
    Fútbol OrganizadoRETJEl fútbol asociación, organizado bajo los auspicios de la FIFA, las confederaciones y las asociaciones o autorizado por estas entidades.
    Otros ServiciosRFAFServicios desarrollados por un agente de fútbol para o en nombre de un cliente que no sean servicios de representación, entre los que se incluyen el asesoramiento jurídico, la planificación financiera, el <<ojeamiento>>, la consultoría, la gestión de los derechos de imagen y la negociación de contratos comerciales, entre otros.
    Notificación de PagoRCCFEl documento emitido por la Cámara de Compensación de la FIFA que detalla la cantidad pagadera a la Cámara de Compensación de la FIFA.
    PlataformaRFAFMedio digital gestionado por la FIFA a través del cual se llevan a cabo los procedimientos de concesión de licencias y resolución de disputas, así como el desarrollo profesional continuo y la presentación de cualquier información requerida.
    JugadorEstatutosTodo futbolista con licencia expedida por una federación.
    Reglas ProcesalesRCCFLas normas procesales que rigen el tribunal de fútbol
    Club ProfesionalRETJClub que no es meramente un club aficionado.
    Periodo ProtegidoRETJUn periodo de tres temporadas completas o de tres años, lo que ocurra primero, tras la entrada en vigor de un contrato; si el contrato se firmó antes de que el jugador profesional cumpliese 28 años, o por un periodo de dos temporadas completas o de dos años, lo que ocurra primero, tras la entrada en vigor de un contrato, si el contrato se firmó después de que el jugador profesional cumpliese 28 años.
    Club Exclusivamente aficionadoRETJClub que no tenga vínculo jurídico, económico o de facto con un club profesional que:i. solo pueda inscribir a jugadores aficionados;ii. no tenga inscritos a jugadores profesionales, oiii. no haya inscrito a jugadores profesionales en los tres años anteriores a una fecha determinada.
    InscripciónRETJActo de registrar por escrito los datos de un jugador, entre otros:– fecha de inicio de la inscripción (formato: dd/mm/aaaa);– nombre completo (todos los nombres y apellidos) del jugador;– fecha de nacimiento, género, nacionalidad, estatus de aficionado o profesional(conforme al art. 2, apdo. 2 del presente reglamento); y tipo de inscripción(permanente o en préstamo);– tipo(s) de fútbol que practicará (fútbol once/futsal/fútbol playa);– nombre del club en la asociación donde jugará (incluida la FIFA ID del club);– categoría de formación del club en el momento de la inscripción;– FIFA ID del jugador;– FIFA ID de la asociación.
    Periodo de InscripciónRETJUn periodo fijado por la asociación correspondiente conforme al art. 6.
    Parte VinculadaCOE FIFALos terceros relacionados con personas sujetas al presente código se considerarán partes vinculadas si cumplen uno o varios de los siguientes criterios:a) representantes y empleados; b) cónyuges y concubinos; c) personas que compartan la misma vivienda, independientemente de la relación personal entre ellas; d) otros miembros de la familia con los que tengan una relación estrecha hasta tercer grado de parentesco; e) entidades legales, sociedades y cualquier otra institución fiduciaria, si la persona sujeta al presente código o la persona que recibe un beneficio indebido:i. ejerce un cargo directivo en dicha entidad, sociedad o institución fiduciaria; ii. controla de forma directa o indirecta dicha entidad, sociedad o institución fiduciaria; iii. es beneficiaria de dicha entidad, sociedad o institución fiduciaria; iv. presta servicios en nombre de dicha entidad, sociedad o institución fiduciaria, independientemente de que exista un contrato formal.
    Entidad de OrigenRFAFClub, federación miembro o liga jurídicamente independiente que abandona el jugador o entrenador para ser empleado o inscrito por la entidad de destino.
    RemuneraciónRFAFRetribución bruta percibida por los servicios prestados, acordada y establecida en el contrato laboral, que incluye el salario base, el pago a la firma, y cualquier importe abonable acordado en caso de cumplirse ciertas condiciones (p. ej., primas por rendimiento y fidelidad). A modo aclaratorio, cabe notar que cualquier indemnización por transferencia futura acordada, así como otras compensaciones no económicas como proporcionar un vehículo, alojamiento o servicios de telefonía no se tendrán en cuenta en el cálculo total de la retribución bruta.
    Contrato de RepresentaciónRFAFAcuerdo por escrito firmado con el objetivo de establecer una relación legal para proporcionar servicios de representación.
    RETJRFAFReglamento sobre el Estatuto y la Transferencia de Jugadores de la FIFA, en su versión vigente.
    RFRIRFAFReglamento de la FIFA sobre las Relaciones con Intermediarios.
    TemporadaRETJPeriodo de 12 meses que comienza el primer día del primer periodo de inscripción fijado por una asociación de acuerdo con el art. 6.
    Segunda Evaluación de CumplimientoRCCFEl segundo paso en el proceso de la Cámara de Compensación de la FIFA de realizar una Evaluación de Cumplimiento para una transacción específica en la que un cliente no pasó la Primera Evaluación de Cumplimiento.
    Liga Jurídicamente IndependienteRFAFEntidad jurídica afiliada a una federación miembro que organiza una o varias ligas y representa el interés común de sus clubes, por ejemplo, al ejercer de empleador de todos los jugadores de los clubes, entre otras actividades.
    Transacción EspecificaRFAFTransacción en la que todas las partes involucradas están definidas e identificadas
    Grupo de InterésEstatutosPersonas, entidades u organismos que, sin ser federaciones miembro de la FIFA o de alguno de sus órganos, tienen intereses en las actividades, acciones, objetivos y políticas de la FIFA o se ven en alguna forma afectados por estas, en particular los clubes, jugadores, entrenadores y ligas profesionales.
    TerceroRETJParte ajena al jugador siendo traspasado, a los dos clubes entre los cuales se traspasa al jugador, o a cualquiera de los clubes anteriores en los que el jugador estuvo inscrito previamente.
    Responsable del TMSRETJPrincipal usuario del TMS y persona de contacto para el club o la asociación con acceso al TMS.
    Usuario del TMSRETJPersona formada y autorizada para acceder al TMS en nombre de un club o asociación. Todos los usuarios del TMS tienen unas credenciales únicas para iniciar sesión.
    Indemnización por FormaciónRETJUna compensación que el nuevo club de un jugador paga, o se compromete a pagar al antiguo club de un jugador, a cambio de la aceptación del antiguo club de liberar al jugador de una relación contractual vinculante. Las indemnizaciones por incumplimiento de contrato de conformidad con el artículo 17 de esta Ley no tienen la consideración de indemnización por transferencia
    Compensación por FormaciónRETJMecanismos que permiten retribuir a los clubes formadores por su papel en la formación y educación de los jugadores jóvenes. Se incluyen la indemnización por formación (v. art. 20) y el mecanismo de solidaridad (v. art. 21).
    TransacciónRFAF(i) Empleo, inscripción o baja de la inscripción de un futbolista con un club o liga jurídica independiente, (ii) empleo de un entrenador con un club, liga jurídicamente independiente o federación miembro; (iii) traspaso de la inscripción de un jugador de un club a otro; (iv) creación, rescisión o variación de las condiciones del contrato laboral de una persona.
    Orden de TransferenciaRETJInformación introducida en el TMS para traspasar a un jugador de un club a otro. El tipo de orden de transferencia se define en función de la información introducida:i. «contratar» o «liberar»;ii. «permanentemente» o «en préstamo»;iii. «jugador profesional» o «jugador aficionado»;iv. «con acuerdo de transferencia» o «sin acuerdo de transferencia»;v. «con pago» o «sin pago».
    Transfer Matching SystemRETJEl sistema de correlación de transferencias, denominado Transfer Matching System (TMS), es un sistema para el almacenamiento de datos basado en la web, cuyo objetivo principal es simplificar el proceso de los traspasos internacionales de jugadores, así como mejorar la transparencia y el flujo de información.
    PruebaRETJPeriodo de tiempo durante el cual un jugador no inscrito en un club es evaluado por dicho club.
    Excepción de ValidaciónRETJProblema relativo a una transferencia internacional del TMS que le impide pasar al siguiente estado y requiere la intervención de la FIFA

    Recruiting Your First Client as a Football/Soccer Agent


    Introduction

    Perhaps one of the hardest stages of being a football agent is when you are looking to recruit your very first client, particularly if you are working alone and not as part of a larger agency. It can be a tense time that requires patience and dedication to find the right opportunity and then capitalise upon it and turn it into a successful agent-client relationship.

    In this blog we will consider the kind of things you should be doing if you are in this position and how to go about finding that very first client. We will also look at the stages of progression towards signing a representation contract and the must-do’s and don’ts for upcoming agents.  

    Finding the Opportunity

    Depending upon your age and previous experience in the football industry, initially finding an opportunity to try to recruit a player can vary in difficulty. For younger agents, the likelihood is that such an opportunity will only arise on the back of attending as many games as possible. By identifying the kind of clientele you are hoping to work with and other specifics can help you to narrow down the kind of fixtures you will attend. For example, a young agent may attend academy fixtures to engage and interact with scouts and parents of players below first team level. Younger academy games are important as this is an opportunity to build up relationships with parents and others which can grow over two years or so before they may be looking for an agent.

    As per FIFA Regulations concerning the protection of minors, agents are not able to enter into representation agreements until the player is within six months of when they may legally sign their first professional contract. Hence, agents must be aware that this varies between countries. For example, in associations such as Germany they may sign a professional playing contract as young as 16, so agents will be trying to represent them at 15 and a half. Alternatively in other countries, agents cannot sign representation agreements until they are 17 and a half, before signing their first playing contract at 18. Attending fixtures prior to this age gives you the window of opportunity to establish the foundations of a relationship for when the time comes. 

    Football fixtures can also be an intimidating environment. There were many occasions when I was just starting out with attending fixtures that I would try to talk myself into approaching parents watching games or even scouts, but found it difficult when the time came to know the best way of instigating a conversation with them and making that first connection. It is particularly important that an upcoming agent quickly becomes accustomed to and comfortable with making initial contact and striking up a conversation in such an environment.

    This comes down to repetition. The more you put yourself into an uncomfortable position and force yourself to take steps to speak directly to people, the more comfortable it will become over time and it won’t be long before you have no hesitation in doing so. Although every conversation may not always go the way that you’d hoped, as sometimes others may not be interested in speaking with you, the worst possible outcome is that you fail to build a relationship with them. However, the chances are, the majority of conversations you have will lead to future conversations and could open up various possibilities to you, including the chance of signing your first client. The main aim of these first conversations is to leave a good impression and to obtain the contact details of the other person so you can keep in touch. 

    The hope is that eventually, after spending long enough putting the hard graft in and making the effort to continue, even at times when it may seem to not be getting you anywhere, an opportunity may arise where you come to learn of a player that may be looking for representation and you have a contact or other way in which you can make contact with their parents or even with the player themselves if they over 18. The next steps are of utmost importance and maybe sometimes comes down to making sure you don’t do certain things rather than what you do do.

    An important point to note when finding an opportunity is whether you are operating as an agent alone, as part of a smaller agency or perhaps as a recruitment employee of a larger agency. Each has different advantages and disadvantages, it is up to the individual as to how they would rather work. For example, those working for larger agencies will have greater access to a wider network as well as being able to include senior agents in discussions and demonstrate the services they have provided to star players in the game once they begin discussions with the players and their parents. However, in such situations, they are employees of larger agencies and will be paid a salary. Alternatively, agents may work in more of a commission based partnership under a smaller agency which may give more power and influence to the individual agent. The way in which you are working as an agent will affect the methods you use to identify opportunities to sign players and how you work with them. 

    What not to do

    To summarise what you absolutely must not do, it can be put as simply as: DO NOT ACT UNPROFESSIONALLY. 

    Expanding on this, once there may be an opportunity for you to sign a first client, it is vital not to become overexcited and to rush into trying to progress the chance quicker than is appropriate. Some agents will want to grab the opportunity as soon as possible, but if this is done unprofessionally, the likelihood is that it will not produce the result you are hoping for.

    There are some simple rules for certain things that you should avoid. We will then go onto look at the advisable alternatives later on in the blog. 

    Firstly, do not use social media platforms to approach players or their families. In the modern era, it is likely that you will be able to find both the players and their close relatives on at least one form of social media. Whilst this may help you in identifying who their parents are and who to look out for on the side of a football pitch, approaching them directly through social media is unprofessional and is unlikely to be looked upon kindly by those you are trying to engage with. 

    If you have identified the parents or an alternative method to make contact with the player, you must not abuse this position and utilise it in the wrong way. Repetitive pestering and impatient messaging is only likely to irritate the contact and will not help you build a relationship with the player in any way. Do not insist on spending entire games watching with them and making them feel pressured themselves. Presenting yourself as someone who will make the player and their family uncomfortable will subsequently undermine your chances of building a strong relationship and going on to represent the player.

    One way in which an agent may also inadvertently discourage the family from allowing you to represent the player is if you give the impression that you are ‘taking them away’. Particularly for younger clients, agents should attempt to integrate themselves as part of the wider support team of the player, almost as another family member. By providing your expertise as well as broader encouragement, you can develop the relationship into a feeling that everyone is working together for the best of the player rather than separately. 

    In some instances, the opportunity may have arisen with a younger academy player who shows great potential. There is a tendency to assume that if a player has high potential for a future in the game, a lot of agents will be vying for their signature. However, you must not approach them if they are not of the legal age. Not only does this infringe upon FIFA and National Association regulations, but it will also demonstrate that you are unprofessional in your approach to your work as an agent. Consequently, the family and player are likely to remove you from consideration for future representation as they will much rather work with a professional individual. 

    Since the new FIFA Agent Regulations came into force, there has been some confusion around when you can approach players or families as an agent. In short, you must not present yourself to a player or their families as an agent if you have not yet obtained your FIFA licence. There is a clear distinction between how a licenced and unlicenced individual must behave. Although you may attend games and talk with people freely without a licence, you must not do so in the capacity of an agent nor speak to families or others about your intentions as an agent.

    One final point on what not to do is something that is surprisingly common in the agency profession. Our advice would be that you should never pay the player or their families to encourage them to sign with you or your agency. Occasionally, parents may ask for money for themselves rather than for the benefit of the player and if they originally sign for money, the chances are that one day they may move on to another agency for more money. It is not advisable to begin your professional relationship between you as the agent and the player and their families upon the foundations of financial reward. The only instance where sharing money could be appropriate is if there is a family member who is also an officially licenced agent that is representing their relative but would like to partner with you to improve the services they can provide. In such cases, all financial details will be based upon previously agreed shared commission. 

    The Essentials

    On the other side of this is the ‘must-do’s’. To simplify this; DO ACT PROFESSIONALLY.

    The professional way of initiating conversation with the player or their families, rather than social media, is to approach them appropriately at a game. This is by far the best way of beginning to build the relationship as in-person interaction is the most efficient method of leaving a positive first impression. You can introduce yourself and briefly acknowledge your position as an agent. From then you will recognise each other at future games and can give simple pleasantries as you walk by or strike up further conversations if the circumstances suit. It is a matter of making a judgement as to when is the right time to make conversation and when it is best to not go beyond a quick “hello”. At some point along the relationship, you may be able to obtain a phone number or other contact details and can then engage in conversation with them professionally and it may get to the stage of having phone calls or a zoom call once the topic of your interest in representing the player as a client has been discussed.

    Timing is essential. If you encroach on the subject of representation prematurely, it may be of detriment to your relationship. It is essential to accurately assess your relationship with the player and their family and focus more on building a good and trusting connection with them before discussing the possibility of representing the player as a client. In some cases, if it is permissible and appropriate, agents have entered into purely commercial agreements with players and their families to source them a boot deal at a younger age than they would be able to sign a representation deal. Although you must ensure this complies with regulations, it may be another way of progressing your relationship up until the point of finding the right time to sign a representation contract.

    Once you have identified a target and have initiated that first point of contact and addressed the topic of representing the player, you can then move onto the stages of recruitment. Depending on the exact circumstances this may vary; ultimately it comes down to your personal judgement as to the best next steps in each situation and depending upon the point the relationship has reached. However, below is an outline of how a typical appropriate recruitment process may play out:

    1. The Approach: Being introduced to or approaching the player and/or their family and making initial contact and building the relationship.
    2. Organised meeting: This is your first chance to demonstrate where you can add value as an agent to the player and to his family. In a comfortable and neutral environment such as a cafe or restaurant, you can initially pitch your attributes as an agent and present an individualised assessment of the player. The goal of this stage is to generate initial interest, intrigue and engagement in the hope of leading to further conversations in the future. This is an introductory meeting rather than a contract signing meeting! The next step may also then be to have a meeting with just the player to develop your personal relationship with him and gain a better understanding of his ambitions and goals in his career as well as what he is looking for in an agent.
    3. Attending games: Throughout the process it is important to continue to attend games and monitor the recruitment target. As mentioned, this gives you further chances to interact with the family and also to make further assessments on the player. Additionally, the family and the player will appreciate your dedication and interest in attending and following the games, which can boost your chances of impressing. It is vital that throughout the process you are demonstrating how and where you can add value to the player’s career.
    4. Closing: The entire process may take anywhere from a couple of weeks to even up to a year to run its course. It really depends on the situation of the player and their family and the relationship you are able to build in the space of time. However, once you have judged that it is an appropriate time, or perhaps the player and their family have enquired about it, you can ask if they are looking to make a decision and they may wish to see the representation contract. It is a necessity that you insist on them seeking independent legal advice and are also willing to answer any questions or queries they may have. Significantly, just because the process has progressed this far does not guarantee a decision either way. The important thing to remember is to remain patient and professional. Do not rush the family into making a decision, assist them in any way you can but remember that it is ultimately their decision and you can only give the best possible account of yourself.

    Summary


    Without clients, an agent is not able to do the very purpose of their job. Hence, recruiting the first client is a major milestone in the career of an upcoming agent. Whilst perhaps a daunting and sometimes even frustrating task, it is also part of the excitement and should be a cherished opportunity. It is the platform to launch your agency career and therefore, approach it with utmost professionalism and a willingness to accept failures and learning curves but with the determination to keep persevering and a belief in your own abilities and aptitude that the right opportunity will materialise.

    İlk FIFA Futbol Menajerliği Sınavına (Nisan 2023) Genel Bakış: Deneyimler, Sonuçlar Üzerine Değerlendirmeler ve Bir Sonraki Sınava Hazırlık…

    Giriş

    19 Nisan Çarşamba günü, 138 ülkeden yaklaşık 3,800 kişi, yeni uygulamaya konulan FIFA Futbol Menajerliği Sınavına girdi. Bu kişilerin birçoğu hali hazırda birkaç yıldır lisanslı menajer olarak çalışıyor olsa da yeni lisanslama kriterleri gereği, futbol dünyasında faaliyet gösteren bir menajer olarak menajerlik faaliyetine devam edebilmek için bu sınavın başarıyla tamamlanması gerekmektedir. Sınavdan önceki haftalarda sınava yönelik büyük bir beklenti ve tartışma ortamı bulunmaktaydı ve sınavın sonuçlanmasının ardından ise bu tartışmalar devam etti.

    Sınavın küresel sonuçları ve 30’dan fazla ülkede sınava giren menajerlerle yapılan değerlendirmeler uyarınca, bu yazıda FIFA Menajerlik Sınavı’nın ilk oturumuna, geliştirilmesi gereken alanlardan olumlu yönlerine kadar ayrıntılı bir incelemede bulunuyor olacağız. Sınavın yapısının değerlendirmesinin yanı sıra, sınav oturumunu, ülke federasyonları arasında sınavın nasıl farklılık gösterdiğini özetleyecek ve son olarak bu sınava giren adayların sonuçlarını değerlendireceğiz.

    Sınavın Yapısı

    Beklenildiği gibi, aldığımız geri bildirimlerin çoğu FIFA Menajerlik Sınavının altı temel FIFA düzenlemesinden alınan bir dizi düzenlemeyi kapsadığını doğrulamıştır, bu düzenlemeler ise şu şekilde sayılabilir: FIFA Futbol Menajerlik Talimatı (FFAR); Oyuncuların Statüsü ve Transferi Talimatı (RSTP); FIFA Tüzüğü; FIFA Etik Kuralları; FIFA Disiplin Talimatı  (FDC); ve FIFA Çocuk Koruma Araç Seti. Toplamda 528 sayfalık materyale ilişkin bilgileri değerlendirilen menajerlerden, kendi temin etmiş olmaları gereken dijital cihazlarında çoktan seçmeli soruları yanıtlamaları istendi. 

    Farklı zaman dilimlerinde olan bazı ülke federasyonlarında sınava giren menajerler, dünyanın diğer bölgelerinde sınava giren menajerlerde çok daha önce sınavı tamamladılar. Dünyadaki tüm menajerler arasında, soruları ve cevapları tartışmak ve sınavın içeriği hakkında avantaj elde etmeye çalışmak için büyük bir iletişim gayreti olsa da FIFA, sınavı yaklaşık 200 sorudan oluşan bir havuzdan oluşturmuş ve bu havuzdan seçilen sorular rastgele adaylara sunulmuştur. Sonuç olarak, bir menajerin aynı salondaki başka bir menajerle ya da günün erken saatlerinde sınava girmiş olan menajerlerle aynı sınava girme ihtimali son derece düşüktü. Dolayısıyla, aynı zor sorunun iki adayın karşısına çıkma ihtimalinin düşük olması nedeniyle daha erken saatlerde sınava girmiş olan temsilcilerin son dakikalarda hangi konulara odaklanılması gerektiği konusunda verdikleri tavsiyeler faydasız hale gelmiştir.

    Pek çok kişi, farklı sorular için gereken bilginin farklılık göstermesi, dolayısıyla bazı temsilcilerin diğerlerine göre daha ‘kolay’ sınavlara girmesi nedeniyle bunun adil olmadığını savunmuştur. Bu konudaki son nokta, rastgele soruların seçilmesiyle yapılan kombinasyonun, FIFA’nın sınavın %70’inin FFAR ve RSTP sorularından oluşacağı yönündeki iddiaların, soru havuzunun rastgele belirlenmesi nedeniyle mümkün olmadığı anlamına gelmektedir. Bazı adaylar, sınavlarında yönetmeliklerin aynı maddesiyle ilgili dört soruya kadar karşılaştıklarını bildirmişlerdir. 

    Soruların rastgele seçilmesinin yanı sıra, sınava giren birçok aday, sorulan soruların yönetmeliklerden ve FIFA düzenlemelerinden kopuk olduğunu, spekülasyon ya da öznel görüş gerektirdiğini, genellikle açıkça anlaşılmadığını ve muğlak olduğunu, tasarlandığı gibi menajerlerin yetenek ve bilgilerini test etmekten uzak olduğunu belirtmiştir. Hatta ve hatta, bazı soruların sınava girmek için seçtikleri dilden bağımsız olarak bir başka resmi FIFA dilinde karşılarına çıktığını belirten adaylar da bulunmaktadır.

    Adayların 20 sorunun tamamını cevaplamak için belirli bir süreleri olsa da emin olmadıkları soruları atlayıp geri dönebildiler veya süre elverdiği takdirde cevaplarını iki kez kontrol edebildiler. Ancak bir ülkede gözetmenin adaylara sınavın bitmesine 7 dakika kaldığını söylediği ancak FIFA portalının 3 dakika sonra sınav sayfasını otomatik olarak kapattığı, yani birçok adayın soruları cevapsız bıraktığı veya yeterli kontrol süresini hesaba katmadığı bildirilmiştir. İlgili ülke federasyonu aracılığıyla FIFA’ya resmi şikayetler yapılmış ve menajerlerin sınava tekrar girmelerine izin verilmesi yönünde talepte bulunulmuştur.

    Sınav Oturumu

    Sınavın dünyanın farklı yerlerinde nasıl gerçekleştiğine dair bizlerle inanılmaz geniş bir yelpazede yorum ve düşünceler paylaşılmıştır.

    Öncelikle, 19 Nisan’dan önceki haftalar ve günlerin, sınava girmeyi uman birçok kişi için stres ve zorluklara neden olduğunu söylemek gerekir. Bazı ulusal federasyonlarda e-postalara verilen yanıtlarda uzun gecikmeler yaşandığı, sınava girmek için gerekli ödeme yöntemlerinin belirlenmesi ve adaylarla sınav günü ve sınavla ilgili ayrıntıların netleştirilmesi konusunda iletişim kurulamadığı belirtilmiştir. Birçok aday; ödeme makbuzu, onay yazısı gibi sınava girebilmek için gerekli bir belgenin bulunup bulunmadığı veya hangi belgeleri sınava girebilmek için yanlarında götürmeleri gerektiğine dair bir bilgi sahibi olmadan sınav yerine varmıştır. 

    Sınav ücreti hususu dünya genelinde tartışmalara neden olmuştur. Bazı ülkelerde sınava girme ücreti 50 USD civarındayken (az sayıda ülkede sınavın ücretsiz gerçekleştiğine dair haberler bulunmaktadır), kimi ülkelerde bu ücret 1000 USD’nin üzerindeydi ve ülkedeki asgari maaştan dahi yüksekti. Açıkça görülüyor ki, FIFA tarafından standart bir ücret belirlenmemesi, ulusal federasyonların sınav ücretini uygun gördükleri şekilde keyfi olarak belirlemelerine ve muhtemelen bundan maddi çıkar sağlamalarına neden olmuştur.

    Sadece bu süreç bile yeterince tartışma ve kafa karışıklığı yaratmışken, sınav gününün yaşanan deneyimler sınava yönelik genel hissiyatı daha da kötüleştirmiştir. Birçok ülkede, çeşitli nedenlerle sınavın başlangıcında büyük gecikmeler yaşandığı bildirilmiştir. Bazı ülkelerde sınava giren menajer sayısı bir elin parmaklarını geçmezken, bir başka ülkede neredeyse 1000 aday olması sınav esnasındaki kayıt sürecini inanılmaz derecede uzatarak kuyrukların oluşmasına neden olmuştur. Kimi adaylar ise kendilerine verilmeyen ödeme belgesini veya kimlik doğrulama formunu göstermek için beklemek zorunda kalmıştır. Diğer gecikme nedenleri arasında ise wifi bağlantı sorunları, FIFA Platformunda meydana gelen çökmeler, gözetmen karmaşası ile yavaş ve hatalı sınav sistemi gibi sorunlar sayılabilir.

    Kimi ülkelerde sınav, başlaması gereken saatten bir saat sonrasına kadar başlamamış ve adaylar kendilerine sınavın başlaması söylenene kadar oturup beklemek zorunda kalmıştır. Bazı adaylar ise kendilerinden kaynaklanmayan problemler nedeniyle sınava diğer adaylardan daha geç başlamak zorunda kalmıştır ve kendi hataları olmamasına rağmen sınavın sonunda kalan süreden mahrum bırakılmışlardır. Platform, bir sonraki sınavda çökmelere neden olan çok sayıda eşzamanlı oturum açma işlemini idare edecek şekilde geliştirilebilir. Pek çok farklı ülke federasyonunda ortak bir sorun olarak, pek çok kişinin sınava ciddi derecede geç başlaması söz konusu olmuştur.

    FIFA kurallarına göre, adayların sınava FIFA Temsilci Platformu üzerinden erişebilmeleri için kendi dizüstü bilgisayarlarını temin etmeleri gerekiyordu ve şeffaf bir plastik su şişesinin yanı sıra kişisel notlar içermeyen FIFA Çalışma Materyallerine izin veriliyordu. Matematiksel hesaplamalar için ise adaylara kalem ve kağıt sağlanacaktı. Ancak almış olduğumuz geri bildirimler, bu katı önlemlerin birçok ulusal federasyonla düzgün bir şekilde paylaşılmadığını ve yeterince uygulanmadığını göstermiştir. Daha az ciddi durumlarda, adaylar sınavlara iPad ve tabletleri aracılığıyla girmiş, aynı anda sosyal medya platformlarına ve ihtiyaç duymaları halinde Whatsapp gibi iletişim yöntemlerine erişmişlerdir. Ayrıca birçok aday, FIFA Çalışma Materyallerini dijital olarak yükleyerek, bir soruyu yanıtlamak adına ‘ctrl + f’ işlevini kullanmak suretiyle belgelerin ilgili bölümlerini hızlı bir şekilde bulmuş ve sınavı kolaylaştırmışlardır. Ancak, bir ülkede çalışma materyallerinin yüklenmesinde sorun yaşanmış ve FIFA platformu üzerinden adayların karşısına sadece ilk 40 sayfa çıkmıştır. Bunun üzerine adaylar gözetmenlerle görüşmek ve çalışma materyallerine kendi yollarından erişmenin kabul edilebilir olup olmadığını sormak zorunda kaldıklarından gecikmeler yaşanmıştır.

    Ne yazık ki, kimi federasyonlar nezdinde düzenlenen sınavlarda FIFA’nın sınav kurallarından kaçmak nispeten daha kolaydı. Adaylardan aldığımız geri bildirimlere göre, adaylar arasında sınava dair ortak hareket etmeye ve işbirliğine dair çok sayıda geri bildirim vardı. Görünüşe göre birçok ulusal federasyonun sınav salonlarında endişe verici bir kontrol eksikliği meydana gelmiş ve FIFA kuralları genel olarak küresel çapta zayıf bir şekilde uygulanmıştı. Bize bildirilen özellikle sıra dışı bir vakada, adaylardan biri kendi bünyesinde çalıştırdığı avukatın yanına oturduğu, kendi giriş bilgileri ile platforma girerek bir başkası adına sınavı tamamladığı bildirilmiştir.

    Dünya genelinde pek çok kişinin yeni FIFA Menajerlik Sınavıyla ilgili en büyük endişelerinden biri, sınava yalnızca FIFA’nın üç resmi dilinde; İngilizce, Fransızca ve İspanyolca girebilmeleriydi. Adayların büyük bir kısmı için bu diller, ikinci hatta üçüncü dilleriydi ve özellikle zaman baskısı altında ek bir zorluk boyutu yaratıyordu. Bazı Arap ve Alman temsilcilerden gelen geri bildirimler bu sorunu özellikle vurgulamıştır. Bununla birlikte, bazı ülkelerde gözetmenlerin adayların soruları tercih ettikleri dile çevirmek için dijital çeviri araçlarını kullanmalarına izin verdikleri tarafımıza bildirilmiştir. Bu durum sadece FIFA’nın sınav politikasına aykırı olmakla kalmayıp, aynı zamanda bu adayları, soruları tercüme edemeyen ve bilmedikleri bir dilde cevap vermek zorunda kalan diğer temsilciler karşısında avantajlı konuma geçmelerini sağlamıştır. Bazı adaylar bu konuda FIFA’ya resmi şikayette dahi bulunmuşlardır.

    Birçok ülkede sınav sürecinin sona ermesinin ardından yaşanan kaos da başka zorluklar yaratmıştır. FIFA portalı 60 dakika dolduktan sonra otomatik olarak kapanmıştır. Ancak sınavı erken bitiren birçok aday sınav salonunda serbestçe ayağa kalkabilmiş, sohbet edebilmiş ve diğerler adaylar sınavdayken sınav salonundan çıkabilmişlerdir. Bu durum, sınavı tamamlamaya çalışanlar için uygunsuz sınav koşulları yaratmış ve daha fazla şikayete yol açmıştır.

    Kontrol eksikliğinin, menajerlerin dünyanın farklı yerlerinde sınavı geçmesi için bir dengesizlik ve fırsat eşitsizliği yarattığı aşikardır. Katı düzenlemelerden kaçamayan adaylar, sosyal medya platformlarına, dijital yardıma erişimi olan ve diğer adaylarla sınav esnasında ortak hareket edebilen farklı ülkelerdeki diğer adaylara karşı otomatik olarak dezavantajlı durumda kalmıştır. Eylül ayındaki sınav için FIFA’nın her ülke federasyonunun uygulanabilir sınav koşulları hakkında yeterince bilgilendirilmesini ve bunları uygun şekilde uygulamak için bir sistem uygulanmasını sağlamasını umut ediyoruz.

    FIFA veya ülke federasyonları tarafından ileriye dönük sınavlarda hesaba katılması gereken ancak ilk sınavda üzerinde durulmayan bir başka husus da bulunmaktadır. Örneğin, engellilik hali bulunan adaylar için zaman avantajı tanınmaması ve bu durum hakkında bilgi almak için ülke federasyonlarıyla temasa geçenlerin ya göz ardı edildiği ya da reddedildiğine dair tarafımıza birtakım bilgilendirmelerde bulunulmuştur. Disleksi, dikkat eksikliği ve hiperaktivite bozukluğu gibi rahatsızlıklar, adayların bu kadar kısa bir süre içinde yüksek basınçlı ve dikkat dağıtıcı bir ortamda soruları yanıtlamakta daha yavaş kalmalarına neden olmaktadır. Genel olarak çoğu sınavda, bu adaylara zorlukları minimuma indirmek için ek süre verilir veya başka önlemler alınır, ancak ilk FIFA Temsilci Sınavında durum böyle olmamıştır.

    Sonuç

    Sınavın hemen ardından ortaya çıkan genel kanı, adayların sınavı oldukça zor buldukları ve bazı soruların ya FIFA belgelerinde yer almadığı ya da insanları tuzağa düşürüp başarısız olmalarına neden olacak şekilde tasarlandığı yönündeydi. Yaptığımız ankette 120 adayın %70’inin sınavı ‘zor’ ya da ‘çok zor’ bulduğunu, sadece %5’inin sınavı ‘kolay’ bulduğunu belirttiği gözlemlenmiştir. 

    Adayların iletmiş olduğu en zor şeylerden biri, sonuçları hemen öğrenememenin verdiği zihinsel ıstıraptır. Birçoğu sınavdan sonraki haftayı cevaplarını düşünerek ve yapmış olabilecekleri hatalar üzerinde kafa yorarak geçirmiştir. Dijital ortamda yapılan çoktan seçmeli objektif bir sınav olması nedeniyle, sonuçların sınavın tamamlanmasının hemen ardından veya birkaç saat içinde açıklanabileceği yönünde bir argüman bulunmaktadır. Ancak bu durum, istenmeyen çeşitli problemlerin önüne geçilmesi adına etraflıca bir strateji kurularak atılması gereken bir adımdır.

    Beklendiği gibi sınavdan tam bir hafta sonra Çarşamba günü sonuçlarını merakla bekleyen pek çok kişiye rağmen, 7 iş günü içinde olacak şekilde Cuma günü sonuçların açıklanacağını iddia eden bir kesim de bulunmaktaydı. Görüldüğü üzere, Perşembe günü dünyanın dört bir yanındaki adaylar, sınavı geçtikleri için kendilerini tebrik eden ve lisanslarını almanın son aşamasını tamamlamaya yani ücreti ödemeye davet eden e-postalar almaya başladı! Daha da önemlisi, adaylara sınavda tam olarak kaç puan aldıklarına dair bilgi verilmedi; yalnızca sınavı geçtikleri ya da geçemedikleri bildirildi. 

    2015 öncesinde sınavı geçme oranı %20 civarında olduğundan bu sefer de benzer bir oran bekleniyordu. Ancak pek çok kişiyi şaşırtacak şekilde, sınava giren 3.800 kişinin %52’si (1962) sınavı geçtiklerini bildiren e-postalar aldı. Hatta kimi adaylar, sınav salonundan çıkarken 5’ten fazla soruyu yanlış cevapladıklarından emin olduklarını ve bu nedenle sınavı geçtiklerini görünce şok olduklarını belirtiler. Sınav sonuçlarının ardından FIFA tarafından yapılan tek resmi açıklama, sınavı geçen aday sayısını teyit etmek oldu. Daha önce belirtildiği gibi 15 sorunun doğru cevaplanmasının sınavda başarılı addedilmek adına yeterli sayılıp sayılmadığına dair henüz bir bilgilendirme yapılmamıştır. Geçme oranı, muhtemelen dil ve tercümedeki zorluklardan dolayı farklı ülkelerde büyük farklılıklar göstermiştir. Örneğin, İngilizce, Fransızca veya İspanyolca konuşulmayan ülkelerden birinde 120 adaydan sadece 13’ü sınavı başarıyla tamamlayabilmiştir.

    Özet

    Bu yazıya katkıda bulunan dünyanın dört bir yanındaki menajerlerden aldığımız geri bildirim ve düşüncelerin çeşitliliği, yeni FIFA Futbol Menajerliği sınavının ilk oturumunun önemini göstermektedir. Gözlemlediğimiz üzere adaylar yani artık lisanslı hale gelen menajerler, sınava ilişkin görüşlerini ve deneyimlerini aktarma konusunda oldukça paylaşımcı ve tutkulu haldeler. Bu bilgiler sadece Eylül ayında sınava girecek bir sonraki aday grubunun eğitilmesine yardımcı olmakla kalmayıp, aynı zamanda FIFA ve ülke federasyonlarına bir sonraki sınav için iyileştirilmesi gereken alanları, menajerlerin kendilerini kanıtlamaları ve lisanslarını almaları için mümkün olan en iyi ve en adil sınavı nasıl sunacaklarına da katkıda bulunmaktadır. 

    Gerçekleştirilen ilk menajerlik sınavında başarılı olan herkesi tebrik eder, sınavı geçemeyenler için ise endişelenmeye gerek olmadığını, eylül ayına hazırlanmak ve bir sonraki sınavda başarılı olmak için yeterli zaman olduğunu belirtmek isteriz. 

    Eylül ayında bir sonraki sınava girmeyi planlayanlar, sınava hazırlık kursları hakkında daha fazla bilgi için Erkut Söğüt Akademi sosyal medya platformlarını takip edebilirler.

    A Complete A-Z Guide Explaining the Key Terms and Definitions in the FIFA Football Agent Exam Study Materials

    Introduction

    To pass the FIFA Football Agent Exam, candidates must learn all of the rules, regulations, policies and guidelines contained in the FIFA Study Materials. However, the fundamental aspect of learning these regulations is first understanding the terminology that FIFA uses throughout the document. In all of the relevant clauses, it is hard to comprehend what they are telling you unless you know the definition of each term and abbreviation.

    In the beginning of each FIFA Document the definitions of key terms are outlined. This blog provides a complete A-Z list of every definition you need to know when tackling the FIFA Football Agent Exam and where to find them within the FIFA Study Materials. In each definition we have also underlined the main ideas to help your learning.

    A-Z of FIFA Terminology

    Key: 

    FFAR = FIFA Football Agent Regulations

    FCHR = FIFA Clearing House Regulations

    RSTP = FIFA’s Regulations on the Status & Transfer of Players

    Statutes = FIFA Statutes

    FIFA COE = FIFA Code of Ethics

    TERMDOCDEFINITION
    AcademyFFAR & RSTPAn organisation or an independent legal entity whose primary, long-term objective is to provide players with long-term training through the provision of the necessary training facilities and infrastructure. This shall primarily include, but not be limited to, football training centres, football camps, football schools, etc.
    AgencyFFARAn organisation, entity, firm or private company retaining, comprising, employing or otherwise acting as a vehicle for the business affairs of one or more Football Agents.
    Allocation StatementFCHRThe document issued by the FIFA general secretariat tothe FIFA Clearing House that provides it with the necessary information to process payments, notably the paying and receiving parties and the amounts to be distributed.
    ApproachFFAR(i) Any physical, in-person contact or contact via any means of electronic communication with a Client; (ii) any direct or indirect contact with another person or organisation linked to a Client, such as a family member or friend; or (iii) any action when a Football Agent uses or directs another person or organisation to contact a Client on their behalf in the manner described in (i) or (ii) above.
    AssociationStatutesA football association recognised as such by FIFA. It is a member of FIFA, unless a different meaning is evident from the context.
    Association FootballStatutesThe game controlled by FIFA and organised by FIFA, the confederations and/or the member associations in accordance with the Laws of the Game
    Bridge TransferRSTPAny two consecutive transfers, national or international, ofthe same player connected to each other and comprising a registration of that player with the middle club to circumvent the application of the relevant regulations or laws and/or defraud another person or entity.
    British AssociationsStatutesThe four associations in the United Kingdom – The Football Association, The Scottish Football Association, The Football Association of Wales and The Irish Football Association (Northern Ireland).
    Bureau of the CouncilStatutesThe bureau of the Council as defined in art. 38 of these Statutes.
    ClientFFARA member association, club, player, coach, or Single-Entity League that may engage a Football Agent to provide Football Agent Services
    ClubStatutesA member of an association (that is a member association of FIFA) or a member of a league recognised by a member association that enters at least one team in a competition
    Club-trained PlayerRSTPA player who, between the age of 15 (or the start of the season during which he turns 15) and 21 (or the end of the season during which he turns 21), and irrespective of his nationality and age, registered with his current club for a period, continuous or not, of three entire seasons or of 36 months.
    CoachRSTPAn individual employed in a football-specific occupation by a professional club or association whose:i. employment duties consist of one or more of the following: training and coaching players, selecting players for matches and competitions, making tactical choices during matches and competitions; and/orii. employment requires the holding of a coaching licence in accordance with a domestic or continental licensing regulation.
    Competition PeriodRSTPThe period starting with the first official match of the national league championship or national cup competition, whichever comes first, and ending with the last official match played within those competitions.
    Compliance AssessmentFCHRThe procedure required to be performed by the FIFA Clearing House prior to accepting any potential client in order to satisfy financial regulatory requirements
    ConfederationStatutesA group of associations recognised by FIFA that belong to the same continent (or assimilable geographic region).
    CongressStatutesThe supreme and legislative body of FIFA.
    Connected Football AgentFFARA Football Agent is connected to another Football Agentas a result of their: (i) being employed or contractually retained by the same Agency through which Football Agent Services are conducted; (ii) both being directors, shareholders in, or co-owners of the same Agency through which Football Agent Services are conducted; (iii) being married to one another, domestic partners, siblings of one another, or parent and child or stepchild; or (iv) them having made any contractual or other arrangements, whether formal or informal, to cooperate, on more than one occasion, in the provision of any services or to share the revenue or profits of any part of their Football Agent Services.
    CouncilStatutesThe strategic and oversight body of FIFA.
    CountryStatutesAn independent state recognised by the internationalcommunity
    Dispute Resolution ChamberFCHRThe Dispute Resolution Chamber of the Football Tribunal as defined in the Procedural Rules.
    Distribution StatementFCHRThe document generated by the FIFA Clearing House thatcontains information about payments of training rewards to which the training club(s) in question is (are) entitled.
    Electronic Domestic Transfer SystemRSTPAn online electronic information system with the ability to administer and monitor all national transfers within an association, in line with the principles of the model implemented at international level through the transfer matching system (cf. Annexe 3). At a minimum, the system must collect the full name, gender, nationality, date of birth and FIFA ID of the player, the status (amateur or professional as per article 2 paragraph 2 of these regulations), the name and FIFA ID of the two clubs involved in the national transfer, as well as any payments between the clubs, if applicable. The electronic domestic transfer system must be integrated with the electronic registration system of the association and with the FIFA Connect Interface in order to exchange information electronically.
    Electronic Player PassportRSTPAn electronic document containing consolidated registration information of a player throughout their career, including the relevant member association, their status (amateur or professional), the type of registration (permanent or loan), and the club(s) (including training category) with which they have been registered since the calendar year of their 12th birthday.
    Electronic Player Registration SystemRSTPAn online electronic information system with the ability to record the registration of all players at their association. The electronic player registration system must be integrated with the FIFA Connect ID Service and the FIFA Connect Interface in order to exchange information electronically. The electronic player registration system must provide all registration information for all players from the age of 12 through the FIFA Connect Interface and, in particular, must assign each player a FIFA ID utilising the FIFA Connect ID Service.
    Eleven-a-side footballRSTPFootball played in accordance with the Laws of the Game as authorised by the International Football Association Board.
    Engaging EntityFFARA club, member association or Single-Entity League that mayengage a player or coach.
    Ethics CommitteeFIFA COEReferences to the Ethics Committee in this Code shallinclude the investigatory and/or adjudicatory chamber.
    FCH Terms and ConditionsFCHRThe terms and conditions for a party to take part in a transaction involving the FIFA Clearing House.
    FIFAStatutes“Fédération Internationale de Football Association”
    FIFA Clearing houseRSTPThe entity that acts as an intermediary in relation toprocessing certain payments made in the football transfer system.
    FIFA Connect ID ServiceRSTPA service provided by FIFA assigning globally valid unique identifiers (the FIFA ID) to individuals, organisations, and facilities, providing duplicate information in case of a second registration of the same entity, and keeping a central record of the current registration(s) of all entities with an assigned FIFA ID.
    FIFA Connect InterfaceRSTPA technical interface provided by FIFA within the FIFAConnect Programme, used to exchange electronic end-to-end encrypted messages between member associations, and between member associations and FIFA.
    FIFA Events Any event, including but not limited to FIFA Congress, Council or committee meetings, FIFA competitions, as well as any other event that is within FIFA’s authority or organised by FIFA.
    FIFA IDRSTPThe worldwide unique identifier given by the FIFA Connect ID Service to each club, association, player and football agent.
    First Compliance AssessmentFCHRThe first step in the FIFA Clearing House’s process ofperforming a Compliance Assessment for a specific transaction.
    Football AgentFFARA natural person licensed by FIFA to perform Football AgentServices.
    Football Agent ServicesFFARFootball-related services performed for or on behalf of a Client, including any negotiation, communication relating or preparatory to the same, or other related activity, with the purpose, objective and/or intention of concluding a Transaction.
    Former AssociationRSTPThe association to which the former club is affiliated.
    Former ClubRSTPThe club that the player is leaving
    FutsalRSTPFootball played in accordance with the Futsal Laws of the Game that have been drawn up by FIFA in collaboration with the Sub-Committee of the International Football Association Board.
    IFABStatutesInternational Football Association Board
    IndividualFFARPlayer or coach
    InterestFFAR(i) Any beneficial ownership of a legal person through which the relevant activities of those entities are conducted, except an ordinary and freely accessible non-transferrable personal membership entitling its owner to a single vote in club affairs; and/or (ii) being in a position that may enable the exercise of a material, financial, commercial, administrative, managerial or any other influence over the affairs of a natural or legal person whether directly or indirectly and whether formally or informally.
    International TransferRSTPThe movement of the registration of a player from one association to another association.
    Laws of the GameStatutesThe laws of association football issued by The IFAB in accordance with art. 7 of these Statutes.
    LeagueStatutesAn organisation that is subordinate to an association.
    Match AgentFIFA COEContained in FIFA Match Agent Regulations
    Matching ExceptionRSTPThe status of an international transfer in TMS when both clubs have entered the basic information correctly (player, clubs and transfer instruction), but there are still transfer details (payment details or loan dates) that do not match in both transfer instructions. This mismatch prevents the transfer from proceeding.
    Maternity LeaveRSTPA minimum period of 14 weeks’ paid absence granted to afemale player due to her pregnancy, of which a minimum of eight weeks must occur after the birth of the child.
    Member AssociationStatutesAn association that has been admitted into membership of FIFA by the Congress
    MinorRSTPA player who has not yet reached the age of 18.
    National TransferRSTPThe movement of the registration of a player at an associationfrom one club to another within the same association.
    New AssociationRSTPThe association to which the new club is affiliated.
    New ClubRSTPThe club that the player is joining.
    Non-Compliant PartyFCHRA client of the FIFA Clearing House that fails a First Compliance Assessment and/or a Second Compliance Assessment.
    OfficialStatutes & FIFA COEAny board member (including the members of the Council),committee member, referee and assistant referee, coach, trainer and any other person responsible for technical, medical and administrative matters in FIFA, a confederation, a member association, a league or a club as well as all other persons obliged to comply with the FIFA Statutes (except players, football agents and match agents).
    Official CompetitionStatutesA competition for representative teams organised by FIFA or any confederation
    Official MatchesRSTPMatches played within the framework of organised football, such as national league championships, national cups and international championships for clubs, but not including friendly and trial matches.
    Organised FootballRSTPAssociation football organised under the auspices of FIFA, the confederations and the associations, or authorised by them.
    Other ServicesFFARAny services performed by a Football Agent for or on behalf of a Client other than Football Agent Services, including but not limited to, providing legal advice, financial planning, scouting, consultancy, management of image rights and negotiating commercial contracts.
    Payment Notification FCHRThe document issued by the FIFA Clearing House detailing the amount(s) payable to the FIFA Clearing House.
    PlatformFFARThe ​digital platform operated by FIFA through which the licensing process, dispute resolution process, continuing professional development (CPD) and reporting shall occur
    PlayerStatutesAny football player licensed by an association.
    Procedural RulesFCHRThe Procedural Rules Governing the Football Tribunal
    Professional ClubRSTPA club that is not a purely amateur club.
    Protected PeriodRSTPA period of three entire seasons or three years, whichever comes first, following the entry into force of a contract, where such contract is concluded prior to the 28th birthday of the professional, or two entire seasons or two years, whichever comes first, following the entry into force of a contract, where such contract is concluded after the 28th birthday of the professional.
    Purely Amateur ClubRSTPA club with no legal, financial or de facto links to a professional club that:i. is only permitted to register amateur players; orii. has no registered professional players; oriii. has not registered any professional players in the three years prior to a particular date.
    RegistrationRSTPThe act of making a written record containing details of a player that include:a) the start date of the registration (format: dd/mm/yyyy);b) the full name (first, middle and last names) of the player;c) the date of birth, gender, nationality, status as an amateur or a professional (asper article 2 paragraph 2 of these regulations), and nature of the registration(on a permanent basis or on loan);d) the type(s) of football the player will play (eleven-a-side football/futsal/beachsoccer);e) the name of the club at the association where the player will play (includingthe FIFA ID of the club);f) the training categorisation of the club at the moment of the registration;g) the FIFA ID of the player;h) the FIFA ID of the association.
    Registration PeriodRSTPA period fixed by the relevant association in accordance with article 6.
    Related PartyFIFA COEAny party related to persons bound by the Code shall be considered a related party if they fulfil one or more of the following criteria:a) representative or employee;b) spouse or domestic partner;c) individual sharing the same household, regardless of the personalrelationship;d) other family member with whom they have a close relationship withina third degree;e) legal entity, partnership or any other fiduciary institution, if the personbound by this Code or the person receiving an undue advantagealternatively:i) holds a management position within that entity, partnership orfiduciary institution;ii) directly or indirectly controls the entity, partnership or fiduciaryinstitution;iii) is a beneficiary of the entity, partnership or fiduciary institution;iv) performs services on behalf of such entity, partnership or fiduciaryinstitution, regardless of the existence of a formal contract.
    Releasing EntityFFARA club, member association or Single-Entity League that a player or coach is leaving to be employed and/or registered by an Engaging Entity
    RemunerationFFARGross financial compensation for employment set out in anegotiated employment contract, which includes base salary, any sign-on fee, and any amount payable if certain conditions are fulfilled (for example, a loyalty or performance bonus). For the avoidance of doubt, any future transfer compensation agreed to and any non-salary benefits, such as the provision of a vehicle, accommodation or telephony services, are not considered in the calculation of the gross financial compensation.
    Representation AgreementFFARA written agreement for the purpose of establishinga legal relationship to provide Football Agent Services
    RSTPFFARThe FIFA Regulations on the Status and Transfer of Players.
    RWWIFFARFIFA Regulations on Working with Intermediaries.
    SeasonRSTPA consecutive 12-month period fixed by an association during which its official competitions, such as national league championships and national cup competitions, occur.
    Second Compliance Assessment FCHRThe second step in the FIFA Clearing House’s process of performing a Compliance Assessment for a specific transaction where a client has failed the First Compliance Assessment.
    Single-Entity LeagueFFARAn entity affiliated to a member association that organises a league (or leagues) and represents the common interests of its clubs, for example, by acting as the employer of all club players.
    Specified TransactionFFARA Transaction where all of the parties involved are definedand identified.
    StakeholderStatutesA person, entity or organisation which is not a member association and/or body of FIFA but has an interest or concern in FIFA’s activities, which may affect or be affected by FIFA’s actions, objectives and policies, in particular clubs, players, coaches and professional leagues.
    Third PartyRSTPA party other than the player being transferred, the two clubstransferring the player from one to the other, or any previous club, with which the player has been registered.
    TMS ManagerRSTPThe main TMS user and point of contact for a club or association with access to TMS.
    TMS UserRSTPAn individual trained and authorised to access TMS on behalf of a club or association. All TMS users have their own unique login credentials.
    Training CompensationRSTPA compensation which a new club of a player pays, or commits to pay to a player’s former club, in exchange for the former club’s acceptance to release the player from a binding contractual relationship. Compensation for breach of contract pursuant to article 17 herein is not considered transfer compensation
    Training RewardsRSTPThe mechanisms which compensate training clubs for their role in the training and education of young players, namely training compensation (cf. article 20) and the solidarity mechanism (cf. article 21).
    TransactionFFAR(i) the employment, registration or deregistration of a player with a club or a Single-Entity League; (ii) the employment of a coach with a club, SingleEntity League or a member association; (iii) the transfer of the registration of a playerfrom one club to another; (iv) the creation, termination or variation of an Individual’s terms of employment.
    Transfer InstructionRSTPThe information entered in TMS to transfer a player from one club to another. The transfer instruction type is defined by the information entered: (i) “engage” or “release”; (ii) “permanently” or “on loan”; (iii) “professional player” or “amateur player”; (iv) with transfer agreement” or “without transfer agreement”; (v) “against payment” or “free of payment”
    Transfer Matching SystemRSTPA web-based data information system with the primary objective of simplifying the process of international player transfers as well as improving transparency and the flow of information.
    TrialRSTPA temporary period during which a player that is not registered with a club is evaluated by that club.
    Validation ExceptionRSTPAn issue relating to an international transfer in TMS that prevents it from proceeding to the next status, thus requiring FIFA’s intervention.

    Revisión del Primer Examen para Aspirantes a Agentes de Fútbol de la FIFA (Abril 2023): Reflexión sobre las Experiencias, los Resultados y la Preparación para el Próximo 

    Introducción

    El miércoles 19 de abril del 2023 fue la primera convocatoria del examen de la FIFA para aspirantes a agentes de Fútbol. Alrededor de 3,800 candidatos se presentaron en 138 diferentes asociaciones/países. Muchas de estas personas ya habían estado trabajando como agentes licenciados durante algunos años, pero los nuevos requisitos de licencia exigen que aprueben el examen para permanecer como agentes que pueden operar en el mundo del fútbol. Ha habido mucha anticipación y discusión sobre el examen en las semanas previas y después de la conclusión del examen, las discusiones han continuado.

    Ahora que conocemos los resultados globales del examen y que hemos hablado con agentes que realizaron el examen en más de 30 países, este blog compilará una revisión detallada de la primera sesión del examen de agente de la FIFA, desde las áreas por mejorar hasta las positivas. Evaluaremos la estructura del examen real, resumiremos el evento y cómo difería entre las asociaciones nacionales y, finalmente, los resultados de los candidatos que tomaron el examen en esta ocasión.

    La Estructura

    Como era de esperar, la mayoría de los comentarios que recibimos confirmaron que el examen de agente de FIFA cubrió una variedad de temas tomados de los siete documentos clave de FIFA; Reglamento sobre Agentes de Fútbol (RFAF); Reglamento sobre el Estatuto y la Transferencia de Jugadores de la FIFA (RETJ); Estatutos de la FIFA; Código de Ética de la FIFA; Código Disciplinario de la FIFA (CDF); Reglamento de Procedimiento del Tribunal del Fútbol; y Fundamentos de Salvaguardia del Programa FIFA Guardians. En total, se evaluó a los agentes sobre su conocimiento de las 528 páginas del material de estudio y se les pidió que respondieran preguntas de opción múltiple en el dispositivo digital que debían haber proporcionado ellos mismos.

    En algunas asociaciones con zonas horarias avanzadas, los agentes completaron el examen mucho antes que otros agentes que intentaban realizar el examen en otras partes del mundo. Hubo mucha comunicación entre los agentes globales, discutiendo las preguntas y respuestas y tratando de obtener una visión ventajosa de los contenidos del examen. Sin embargo, la FIFA había estructurado el examen recopilando un grupo de alrededor de 200 preguntas que luego se seleccionaron aleatoriamente en cada examen. Por lo tanto, las posibilidades de que un agente realizara exactamente el mismo examen que cualquier otra persona en la misma sala o que los agentes que habían realizado el examen más temprano en el día eran extremadamente bajas. Esto significaba que el consejo dado por los agentes que ya habían realizado el examen sobre los temas a enfocarse para una revisión de última hora era nulo y sin efecto, ya que las posibilidades de que apareciera la misma pregunta difícil eran poco probables.

    Muchos han argumentado que esto es injusto ya que el conocimiento requerido para diferentes preguntas variaba y, por lo tanto, algunos agentes se presentaron a exámenes “más fáciles” que otros. El punto final sobre esto es que la combinación aleatoria significó que la sugerencia original de FIFA, de que el 70% del examen consistiría en preguntas RFAF y RETJ no fue posible debido a la aleatorización del grupo de preguntas. Algunos candidatos informaron tener hasta cuatro preguntas sobre el mismo artículo del reglamento en su examen.

    Las preguntas no solo se seleccionaron al azar, sino que muchos de los que tomaron el examen dijeron que varias de ellas estaban fuera del reglamento y de los documentos de la FIFA, además de ser de basadas en especulaciones u opiniones subjetivas, a menudo no claramente definidas y vagas, lejos de evaluar la aptitud y el conocimiento de agentes, como debería haber sido diseñado para hacerlo. En algunos casos extremos, los candidatos informaron que algunas preguntas se formularon en otro idioma oficial de la FIFA, independientemente del idioma que habían seleccionado para realizar el examen.

    Los candidatos tuvieron una hora para responder las 20 preguntas, pero podían omitir preguntas y volver a ellas si no estaban seguros, incluso verificar sus respuestas dos veces si el tiempo lo permitía. Sin embargo, en un país se informó que el supervisor les había dicho a los candidatos que les quedaban 7 minutos antes de terminar el examen, pero el portal de la FIFA cerró automáticamente la página del examen después de 3 minutos, lo que significa que muchos agentes habían dejado preguntas sin responder o no habían tenido en cuenta el tiempo de verificación suficiente. Se han presentado quejas formales a la FIFA a través de la asociación nacional pertinente y se han pedido a los agentes que se les permita volver a realizar el examen.

    El Evento

    Ha habido un espectro increíblemente amplio de reseñas y opiniones compartidas con nosotros sobre cómo se llevó a cabo realmente el examen en diferentes partes del mundo.

    Para empezar, la preparación para el examen en las semanas y días previos al 19 de abril causó estrés y complicaciones para muchos que esperaban rendir el examen. En algunas asociaciones nacionales hubo denuncias de grandes retrasos en las respuestas a los correos electrónicos, la distribución de los métodos de pago para realizar el examen y la falta de comunicación con los candidatos sobre los detalles del día y el examen. Muchos admitieron que llegaron al lugar de examen correspondiente sin estar completamente seguros de que se les permitiría realizar el examen, ya que nunca recibieron un recibo de pago ni ningún tipo de confirmación de que fueran aceptados como candidatos para el examen.

    El pago en sí provocó un debate entre los agentes al rededor del mundo. En algunos países, el costo para realizar el examen fue de alrededor de $50 USD (hay informes de que fue gratuito en un pequeño puñado), mientras que en otros el costo superó los $1000 USD y superó el salario mínimo del país. Claramente, la FIFA no había estipulado un costo estandarizado y las asociaciones nacionales pudieron establecer arbitrariamente el cargo como lo consideraron oportuno, posiblemente beneficiándose financieramente al hacerlo.

    Si la acumulación por sí sola no había creado suficiente discusión y confusión, el día del examen en sí solo exasperó el sentimiento general hacia el examen. En muchos países, se informaron grandes retrasos en el comienzo del examen por una variedad de razones. Aunque en algunas asociaciones hubo pocos agentes que llegaron para rendir el examen, en un país había casi 1000 candidatos y, por lo tanto, el proceso de registro fue increíblemente largo y las filas se alargaron a una distancia considerable, esperando para presentar una forma de identificación y comprobante de pago, que incluso algunos nunca recibieron. Otras razones incluyeron fallas en la conexión wifi, bloqueos de la Plataforma de Agente de la FIFA, confusión del supervisor y problemas con un sistema de examen lento y defectuoso.

    En algunos países, el examen en sí no comenzó hasta bastante más que una hora después de la hora prevista y los candidatos se veían obligados a sentarse y esperar hasta que se les indicara que comenzaran. Algunos candidatos finalmente comenzaron más tarde que otros y fueron privados de tiempo al final del examen sin responsabilidad propia. La plataforma se puede mejorar para manejar la gran cantidad de inicios de sesión simultáneos que causaron los bloqueos esta vez. Fue un tema común en bastantes asociaciones nacionales diferentes que muchas comenzaron significativamente tarde.

    De acuerdo con los reglamentos de la FIFA, los candidatos debían proporcionar su propia computadora portátil para acceder al examen a través de la Plataforma de Agentes de la FIFA, y se les permitió una botella de agua de plástico transparente, así como los Materiales de Estudio de la FIFA sin anotaciones personales. Luego, se les proporcionaría lápiz y papel para los cálculos matemáticos. Sin embargo, nuestros comentarios han demostrado que estas medidas estrictas no se habían comunicado adecuadamente a muchas asociaciones nacionales y no se aplicaron adecuadamente. En casos menos severos, los candidatos hicieron los exámenes a través de sus iPads y tabletas, accediendo simultáneamente a plataformas de redes sociales y medios de comunicación como Whatsapp en caso de que así lo necesitaran. Muchos candidatos también cargaron los materiales de estudio de la FIFA digitalmente, lo que facilitó el uso de la función ‘control/comando + F’ para encontrar rápidamente secciones relevantes de los documentos para responder una pregunta. Sin embargo, en una asociación nacional en particular hubo un problema con la carga de los materiales de estudio y solo aparecieron las primeras 40 páginas para los candidatos a través de la plataforma de la FIFA. Esto resulto en un retraso ya que los candidatos tenían que razonar con los supervisores y determinar si era aceptable acceder a los materiales de estudio a través de su propia ruta.

    Desafortunadamente, la capacidad de evadir las reglas de conducta de los exámenes de la FIFA fue aún más severa en algunas asociaciones. Según los comentarios que hemos recibido de los candidatos, hubo muchos informes de colusión y colaboración entre candidatos. Parece que hubo una falta de control preocupante en muchas salas de examen de las asociaciones nacionales y, en general, las reglas de la FIFA se aplicaron de manera deficiente a nivel mundial. En un caso particularmente extraordinario del que nos informaron, un candidato se sentó junto al abogado interno de su agencia que, según los informes, podría haber usado sus datos de inicio de sesión para aprobar el examen en nombre del posible agente.

    Una de las mayores preocupaciones con el nuevo examen de agente de la FIFA para muchas personas en todo el mundo, es que solo pueden optar por realizar el examen en tres idiomas oficiales de la FIFA; Inglés, Francés y Español. Para una gran parte de los candidatos, este era su segundo o incluso tercer idioma y creaba un nivel adicional de dificultad, especialmente bajo la presión del tiempo. Los comentarios de algunos agentes árabes y alemanes resaltaron particularmente este problema. Sin embargo, se nos ha informado que, en algunos países, los supervisores permitieron que los candidatos usaran herramientas de traducción digital para traducir las preguntas a su idioma preferido. Esto no solo va en contra de la política de la FIFA para el examen, sino que también pone a estos candidatos en una ventaja sobre otros agentes que no pudieron traducir las preguntas y se vieron obligados a abordarlas en un idioma desconocido. Algunos candidatos ya han presentado quejas formales sobre esto ante la FIFA.

    En muchos países también hubo caos tras el final del proceso de examen, lo que creó más dificultades. El portal de la FIFA se cerró automáticamente después de que expiraron los 60 minutos, pero muchos candidatos que terminaron antes de tiempo pudieron levantarse libremente, charlar y alejarse de la sala de examen mientras otros continuaban tomando el examen. Esto creó condiciones de examen inapropiadas para aquellos que intentaban completar el examen y ha dado lugar a más quejas.

    La falta de control creó un desequilibrio y una desigualdad de oportunidades para que los agentes aprobaran el examen en diferentes partes del mundo. Aquellos que no pudieron evitar las estrictas regulaciones quedan automáticamente en desventaja frente a otros en diferentes asociaciones que tenían acceso a plataformas de redes sociales, ayuda digital y podían colaborar con otros candidatos. La esperanza es que, para el examen de septiembre, la FIFA se asegure de que todas las asociaciones nacionales estén adecuadamente informadas sobre las condiciones del examen aplicables y que se implemente un sistema para hacerlas cumplir adecuadamente.

    Ni la FIFA ni las asociaciones nacionales han considerado otros factores que deberían tenerse en cuenta en los exámenes en el futuro. Por ejemplo, no se hicieron concesiones de tiempo para los candidatos que requieren asistencia por discapacidad y tuvimos varios informes de que aquellos que se comunicaron con su asociación nacional preguntando sobre la posibilidad fueron ignorados o rechazados. Las discapacidades como la dislexia, el TDAH y más, hacen que los candidatos tengan velocidades de procesamiento más lentas y dificultades para responder preguntas en un entorno de alta presión y distracción en un período de tiempo tan corto. En la mayoría de los escenarios de examen, a estos candidatos se les otorga tiempo adicional u otras medidas para apaciguar las dificultades, pero este no fue el caso en el primer examen de agente de la FIFA.

    Los Resultados

    La sensación general inmediatamente después del examen fue de que los candidatos lo habían encontrado particularmente difícil y sentían que algunas de las preguntas no estaban incluidas en los documentos de la FIFA o estaban diseñadas para atrapar a las personas y hacer que reprobaran. En nuestra encuesta, encontramos que, de 120 candidatos, el 70 % consideró que el examen era “desafiante” o “muy difícil”, mientras que solo el 5 % votó que había encontrado el examen “fácil”.

    Una de las cosas más difíciles para los candidatos que nos han informado es la angustia mental de no saber de inmediato los resultados. Muchos pasaron la semana siguiente al examen contemplando sus respuestas y pensando demasiado en cualquier error que pudieran haber cometido. Existe el argumento de que tal vez, dado que es un examen objetivo de opción múltiple que se realiza digitalmente, los resultados podrían publicarse inmediatamente después o unas pocas horas después de completar el examen. Sin embargo, este es un tema que necesita una estrategia minuciosa para evitar crear problemas no deseados.

    A pesar de que muchos esperaban ansiosamente sus resultados el miércoles, exactamente una semana después del examen como se esperaba, se discutió que, en cambio, eran 7 días hábiles y que los resultados podrían publicarse el viernes. Resultó que fue el jueves el día que los candidatos de todo el mundo comenzaron a recibir correos electrónicos intermitentes felicitándolos por aprobar el examen e invitándolos a completar la etapa final para obtener su licencia; pagando la cuota! Significativamente, los candidatos no recibieron detalles sobre su puntaje exacto en el examen; era simplemente un pase o un rechazo.

    Antes de 2015, la tasa de aprobación del examen rondaba el 20% y se esperaba que una proporción similar lo aprobara esta vez. Para sorpresa de muchos, el 52% de los 3.800 candidatos, 1962 que realizaron el examen recibieron correos electrónicos confirmando que habían aprobado el examen. Varios nos dieron comentarios indicando que, cuando salieron de la sala de examen, estaban convencidos de que habían respondido incorrectamente a más de 5 preguntas y, por lo tanto, se sorprendieron al ver que habían aprobado. La única declaración oficial después de los resultados del examen que da la FIFA es confirmar el número de candidatos que aprobaron. Aún no se ha hecho ningún comentario sobre si la marca de aprobación se fijó en 15 como se indicó anteriormente. La tasa de aprobación vio números variables en diferentes asociaciones, posiblemente debido a las dificultades en el idioma y la traducción. Por ejemplo, en un país de no habla inglesa, francesa o española, solo 13 de 120 candidatos aprobaron con éxito el examen.

    Resumen

    El volumen de comentarios y pensamientos que recibimos de agentes de todo el mundo al contribuir con este blog indica la importancia de la primera sesión del nuevo examen de la FIFA para Aspirantes a Agentes de Fútbol. Los candidatos, y los ahora agentes autorizados, se sintieron apropiadamente apasionados por expresar sus opiniones y compartir sus experiencias del examen. Esta información no solo ha ayudado a educar a la próxima cohorte de candidatos que pueden intentar presentar el examen en septiembre, sino que también informa a la FIFA y a las Asociaciones Nacionales las áreas de mejora para la próxima vez y cómo ofrecer el mejor y más justo examen posible para que los agentes demuestren sus conocimientos y obtengan su licencia.

    Felicitaciones a todos los que tuvieron éxito en su intento de examen esta vez y a los que no aprobaron, no hay de qué preocuparse, hay tiempo suficiente para prepararse para septiembre y aprobar en el próximo intento.

    Para aquellos que ya planean presentar el próximo examen en septiembre, estén atentos a las plataformas de redes sociales de la Academia Erkut Sogut para obtener más información sobre los cursos de preparación para el examen.

    Understanding the FIFA Football Tribunal

    Introduction

    Before the 1st of October 2021, the decision-making bodies for FIFA were the Players’ Status Committee and the Dispute Resolution Chamber. From 1st of October 2021 onwards, this changed and FIFA amended the regulations governing its decision-making bodies in the Procedural Rules Governing the Football Tribunal document. In efforts to modernise its dispute resolution processes, FIFA established the Football Tribunal which consolidates the powers that the Players’ Status Committee and the Dispute Resolution Chamber previously had. Details are also contained in article 23 of the FIFA Regulations on the Status and Transfer of Players (RSTP). Article 1 paragraph 2 of the Procedural Rules Governing the Football Tribunal explains that the FIFA Football Tribunal is composed of three individual chambers:

    1. the Dispute Resolution Chamber (DRC)
    2. the Players’ Status Chamber (PSC)
    3. the Agents’ Chamber (AC)

    This blog will explain what exactly each chamber is, the purpose it serves, how it functions, and the overall structure. 

    The Dispute Resolution Chamber

    The DRC is composed of a chairperson and two deputy chairpersons, fifteen player representatives and fifteen club representatives. Put simply, the chamber is tasked with adjudicating on employment-related disputes between players and clubs and disputes related to training compensation. Article 23 of the RTSP expands on this jurisdiction. It states that the DRC can pass judgements and settle disputes on the following matters:

    • Disputes between clubs and players in relation to the maintenance of contractual stability where there has been an International Transfer Certificate request and a claim from an interested party in relation to said ITC request. This typically relates to disputes when a player has unilaterally terminated their contract with the club to join a new club and the former club claims that the termination was unlawful and without just cause.
    • Employment-related disputes between a club and a player of an international dimension, including all contractual disputes where the player’s own nationality is different from the country where the club is based.
    • Disputes relating to training compensation and the solidarity mechanism between clubs belonging to different associations that are not governed by the FIFA Clearing House Regulations. However, they will also help settle the same kind of disputed between clubs of the same association provided that the transfer of a player at the basis of the dispute occurs between two clubs belonging to different associations, that are also not governed by the FIFA Clearing House Regulations.
    • Matters of legal or factual complexity in an Electronic Player Passport review process in accordance with article 10 paragraph 3 of the FIFA Clearing House Regulations and disputes between clubs in accordance with article 18 paragraph 2 of the FIFA Clearing House Regulations. These are as follows:
      • 10.3: “Following the completion of its evaluation, the FIFA general secretariat will decide on the registration information to be incorporated and amended in the final EPP. In situations of legal or factual complexity, the following shall apply: 

    a) The FIFA general secretariat shall refer the matter to the Dispute Resolution Chamber in accordance with the Procedural Rules

    b) The complete file is transferred to the Dispute Resolution Chamber and the EPP review process is paused pending a decision. 

    c) The Dispute Resolution Chamber will decide on the final EPP in accordance with the Procedural Rules.”

    • 18.2: “A club that: 

    a) did not take part in the relevant EPP review process; and 

    b) considers, as a result of a bridge transfer (cf. article 5bis of the RSTP), exchange of players or information declared by the new club or its member association (including the training category of the club), that: 

    i. it was incorrectly not entitled to any training rewards, or entitled to a lesser amount than should have been calculated; or 

    ii. an EPP review process should have taken place; and 

    c) considers that it is entitled to receive training rewards, may lodge a claim against the relevant clubs in accordance with article 27 of the Procedural Rules. The Dispute Resolution Chamber shall decide such claims.

    The Players’ Status Chamber

    The PSC is composed of a chairperson and a deputy chairperson and the necessary number of members as decided by the FIFA Council. These members are proposed by members associations, confederations, players, clubs and leagues.

    The chamber serves the function of resolving employment-related disputes between coaches and clubs or associations; transfer-related disputes between clubs, and regulatory applications related to the international transfer system as well as the eligibility of players to participate for representative teams. The chamber can adjudicate on these employment-related disputes if they are of an international dimension. The ‘international dimension’ concerns whether or not the coach is of a different nationality from the club or national association involved. 

    The parties can, however, opt for such disputes to be handled by an independent arbitration tribunal that has been established at national level within the framework of the association and/ or a collective bargaining agreement’. The independent national arbitration tribunal must guarantee fair proceedings. For this option, such an arbitration clause must be included in the employment contract or in the collective bargaining agreement applicable on the parties. 

    The DRC and the PSC are similar in that they both offer arbitration for international disputes between member associations, clubs and players. These disputes are predominantly regulated by the Regulations on the Status and Transfer of Players which provide guidance for the FIFA Football Tribunal Chambers in identifying and formulating the best possible resolution. However, The PSC may also handle disputes between clubs from different associations that cannot be adjudicated by the DRC.

    The Agents’ Chamber

    The AC is also composed of a chairperson and a deputy chairperson and the necessary number of members as decided by the FIFA Council. The chamber serves to offer arbitration and dispute resolution for international disputes involving football agents and intermediaries. The AC has jurisdiction under the FIFA Football Agent Regulations, article 20 over disputes arising out of, or in connection with, a Representation Agreement with an international dimension or where a claim is lodged in accordance with the Procedural Rules Governing the Football Tribunal. The chamber will only be able to address such disputes where no more than two years have elapsed from the event giving rise to the dispute; the application of this time limit shall be examined ex officio in each case.

    Other Points to Note

    FIFA has made a lot of additional changes to the arbitration process through the Procedural Rules. 

    Significantly, the costs of proceedings that pass through the FIFA Football Tribunal chambers are detailed in article 25 which states the following: 

    1. Procedures are free of charge where at least one of the parties is a player, coach, football agent, or match agent. 
    2. Procedural costs are payable in all other types of disputes. Procedural costs are payable on order by the relevant chamber, at the conclusion of a matter. The amounts are defined in Annexe 1 of these Rules.
    3. An advance of costs is payable for proceedings before the PSC, with the exception of proceedings relating to regulatory applications.
    4. Advance of costs shall be paid by the claimant or counter-claimant when the claim or counterclaim is lodged, and are defined in Annexe 1 of these Rules.
    5. The chamber will decide the amount that each party is due to pay, in consideration of the parties’ degree of success and their conduct during the procedure, as well as any advance of costs paid. In exceptional circumstances, the chamber may order that FIFA assumes all procedural costs.
    6. A party that has been ordered to pay procedural costs is only obliged to pay where: 
      1. It requests the grounds of the decision after having been notified of the operative part; or 
      2. The decision has been notified directly with grounds.
    7. Procedural costs shall be paid within ten days as from the notification of the relevant decision to the bank account provided in the decision. The relevant proof of payment shall be filed with the FIFA general secretariat within the same ten days.
    8. No legal costs shall be awarded. Parties shall bear all their own costs in connection with any procedure.

    The basic notion of article 19 of the Procedural Rules Governing the Football Tribunal outlines the preliminary procedural matters allowing for the FIFA General Secretariat to refer a case directly to the chairperson of the relevant chamber of the Football tribunal for an expedited decision. The three paragraphs contained within article 19 are as follows:

    1. The FIFA general secretariat, after assessing whether a claim is complete, will subsequently assess whether: 
      1. The relevant chamber obviously does not have jurisdiction; and/or
      2. The claim is obviously time-barred.
    2. Following this assessment, the FIFA general secretariat may refer the case directly to the chairperson of the relevant chamber of the FT for an expedited decision.
    3. If the chairperson of the relevant chamber of the FT considers that the claim is not affected by any preliminary procedural matters, they shall order the FIFA general secretariat to continue the procedure.

    Mediation is detailed in article 26 and has three main points:

    • If the chairperson of the Football tribunal considers it appropriate, they may invite the parties to mediate the dispute. This means that there is a possibility that if both parties come together and discuss collaboratively, there could be a compromise and resolution found without the need to escalate the case. 
    • The process of mediation is also voluntary and free of charge. 
    • If mediation is successful, a settlement agreement will be signed by the parties and ratified by the mediator and the chairperson of the respective chamber. The settlement agreement shall be considered a final and binding decision.

    One final point to note is that all decisions issued by the Football tribunal chambers; the DRC, PSC or AC can be appealed to the Court of Arbitration for Sport known as CAS, in accordance with chapter 9 of the FIFA statutes. The appeal must be lodged with CAS within 21 days of receipt of the decision. CAS is only likely to become involved if the decision reached by the relevant chamber of the FIFA Football Tribunal is strongly disagreed with by one or more parties who believe that if they exercise their right to appeal the judgement, it may be amended or even reversed. However, the purpose of the FIFA Football Tribunal is to increase the efficiency of resolving disputes of such a nature and therefore, if it serves its purpose, CAS will not be necessary.

    Summary

    The FIFA Football Tribunal in its latest format seems to be able to sufficiently cover all manners of disputes and legal issues that may arise in football and between various parties and stakeholders within the game. The division of the Tribunal into separate chambers improves the focused structure on solving the relevant dispute between separate parties. It is important to understand the purpose that the FIFA Football Tribunal is there to serve and how it is designed to do so in the best possible way.

    Rückblick auf die erste FIFA Spielervermittler-Prüfung (April 2023)

    Die kürzlich wieder eingeführte FIFA Spielervermittler-Prüfung wurde am Mittwoch, dem 19. April, von rund 3.800 Personen aus 138 Ländern abgelegt. Viele dieser Personen waren bereits seit mehreren Jahren lizenzierte Berater. Doch die neuen Zulassungsvoraussetzungen erforderten das Bestehen der Prüfung, um weiterhin als Spielervermittler tätig sein zu können. Im Vorfeld der Prüfung gab es eine Menge Aufregung und Diskussionen über die Prüfung, die auch nach ihrem Abschluss noch andauern.

    Nachdem wir nun Zugang zu den weltweiten Prüfungsergebnissen haben und mit Spielervermittlern aus mehr als 30 Ländern gesprochen haben, nehmen wir in diesem Blog eine detaillierte Bewertung der ersten FIFA Spielervermittler-Prüfung vor. Wir werden den Aufbau der Prüfung analysieren, den Ablauf zusammenfassen und die Unterschiede zwischen den Nationalverbänden herausstellen. Abschließend werden wir uns auf die Ergebnisse der Kandidaten fokussieren und uns dabei sowohl auf verbesserungswürdige Bereiche als auch auf positive Ergebnisse konzentrieren.

    Struktur

    Die FIFA Spielervermittler-Prüfung umfasste eine Vielzahl von Themen aus den sechs grundlegenden FIFA-Dokumenten, darunter das FIFA Spielervermittler-Reglement (FFAR), das Reglement über den Status und Transfer von Spielern (RSTP), die FIFA-Statuten, den FIFA-Ethikkodex, das FIFA-Disziplinarreglement (FDC) und das FIFA Guardians Child Safeguarding Toolkit. Die Agenten wurden auf ihr Verständnis der 528 Seiten Material getestet, indem sie Multiple-Choice-Fragen auf ihren persönlichen digitalen Geräten beantworteten. 

    Berater aus einigen Ländern mit früheren Zeitzonen hatten die Prüfung vor den anderen abgeschlossen, und die Kommunikation zwischen den Beratern weltweit war üblich, um die Fragen und Antworten zu besprechen. Allerdings hatte die FIFA die Prüfung durch eine zufällige Auswahl von Fragen aus einem Pool von etwa 200 Fragen strukturiert, so dass es unwahrscheinlich war, dass zwei Teilnehmende dieselbe Prüfung absolvieren würden. Daher waren Ratschläge von Beratern, die die Prüfung bereits abgelegt hatten, wenig hilfreich. Die zufällige Kombination bedeutete, dass der ursprüngliche Vorschlag der FIFA, 70 % der Prüfung aus FFAR- und RSTP-Fragen zu stellen, nicht möglich war. Einige Kandidaten berichteten, dass sie in ihrer Prüfung bis zu vier Fragen zu ein und demselben Artikel hatten. 

    Mehrere Fragen wurden als losgelöst vom Reglement und den FIFA-Dokumenten kritisiert. Sie waren oft vage und prüften nicht die Eignung und das Wissen der Vermittler, wie es eigentlich vorgesehen war. Es wurde auch berichtet, dass die Fragen in einer anderen offiziellen FIFA-Sprache gestellt wurden, unabhängig davon, welche Sprache der Kandidat gewählt hatte. Die Prüfungsteilnehmenden hatten eine Stunde Zeit, um 20 Fragen zu beantworten, durften aber Fragen auslassen und diese später beantworten. 

    In einem Land wurde die Prüfungsseite jedoch automatisch nach drei Minuten geschlossen, obwohl die Aufsichtsperson noch sieben weiter Minuten zur Absolvierung der Prüfung ankündigte. Dies führte dazu, dass die Spielervermittler Fragen unbeantwortet ließen, woraufhin über die zuständigen nationalen Verbände Beschwerden bei der FIFA eingereicht wurden, mit der Bitte, den Betroffenen eine Wiederholung der Prüfung zu gestatten.

    Event 

    Die Prüfung wurde in verschiedenen Teilen der Welt unterschiedlich durchgeführt, und es gab gemischte Kritiken und Meinungen dazu. Vor der Prüfung gab es einige Stressfaktoren für die Kandidaten, darunter lange Verzögerungen bei der Beantwortung von E-Mails, Probleme mit den Zahlungsmodalitäten und mangelnde Kommunikation über die Prüfung. Die Kosten für die Prüfung waren sehr unterschiedlich: In einigen Ländern lagen sie bei 50 USD, in anderen bei über 1000 USD. 

    Am Tag der Prüfung kam es in einigen Ländern aus verschiedenen Gründen zu erheblichen Verzögerungen, z. B. beim Einchecken, bei Störungen der Wi-Fi-Verbindung und bei Problemen mit dem Prüfungssystem. Einige Kandidaten begannen die Prüfung aufgrund dieser Verzögerungen später als andere. Die Kandidaten mussten ihre eigenen Laptops mitbringen und durften nur eine durchsichtige Plastikwasserflasche und das FIFA-Studienmaterial ohne Notizen mitführen. Einige Kandidaten hielten sich jedoch nicht an diese Regeln und konnten während der Prüfung auf Social-Media-Plattformen und digitale Hilfsmittel zugreifen. In einigen Verbänden gab es Berichte über Absprachen und Zusammenarbeit zwischen Kandidaten, was gegen die FIFA-Regeln verstieß. Die Prüfung war nur in drei offiziellen FIFA-Sprachen verfügbar, was für die Kandidaten eine zusätzliche Hürde darstellte. 

    Auch nach dem Ende der Prüfung kam es zu Problemen, darunter die vorzeitige Abgabe einiger Kandidaten, wodurch die Prüfungsbedingungen für andere gestört wurden. Der Mangel an Kontrolle und Durchsetzung führte zu einem Ungleichgewicht und zu ungleichen Chancen für Spielervermittler, die Prüfung in verschiedenen Teilen der Welt zu bestehen. 

    Es ist zu hoffen, dass die FIFA dafür sorgt, dass alle nationalen Verbände angemessen über die durchsetzbaren Prüfungsbedingungen informiert werden und ein System zu deren angemessener Durchsetzung einführen. Andere Faktoren, wie z. B. zeitliche Zugeständnisse für Kandidaten, die Beihilfe für Behinderte benötigen, wurden von der FIFA und den nationalen Verbänden nicht berücksichtigt. Diese sollten bei künftigen Prüfungen berücksichtigt werden.

    Ergebnisse

    Nach der Prüfung schienen die Kandidaten die Prüfung als äußerst anspruchsvoll zu empfinden und waren der Meinung, dass einige der Fragen entweder nicht in den FIFA-Unterlagen erwähnt waren oder absichtlich so gestellt wurden, dass sie in die Irre geführt wurden. Eine von uns durchgeführte Umfrage ergab, dass von 120 Kandidaten 70 % die Prüfung als “schwierig” oder “sehr schwierig” empfanden, während nur 5 % sie als “leicht” empfanden.

    Eine der größten Schwierigkeiten, mit denen die Kandidaten konfrontiert waren, bestand darin, dass sie die Ergebnisse nicht sofort nach der Prüfung erfuhren. Viele Kandidaten verbrachten die Woche nach der Prüfung damit, über ihre Antworten nachzudenken und sich über eventuelle Fehler zu ärgern, die sie gemacht hatten. Da es sich bei der Prüfung um einen objektiven Multiple-Choice-Test handelt, der digital durchgeführt wird, hätten die Ergebnisse kurz nach oder innerhalb weniger Stunden nach Abschluss der Prüfung veröffentlicht werden können. 

    Am erwarteten Tag der Ergebnisbekanntgabe warteten viele Kandidaten gespannt auf ihre Ergebnisse am Mittwoch, genau eine Woche nach der Prüfung. Es gab jedoch Gerüchte, dass die Ergebnisse möglicherweise erst am Freitag bekannt gegeben würden, was zu einer gewissen Unsicherheit führte. Wie sich herausstellte, erhielten die Kandidaten bereits am Donnerstag E-Mails, in denen sie zum Bestehen der Prüfung beglückwünscht und aufgefordert wurden, die Gebühr für den Erhalt ihrer Lizenz zu entrichten. Allerdings wurde den Kandidaten nicht ihr genaues Prüfungsergebnis mitgeteilt, sondern nur, ob sie die Prüfung bestanden haben oder nicht.

    Vor 2015 lag die Erfolgsquote bei der Prüfung bei etwa 20 %, und man ging davon aus, dass dieses Mal ein ähnlicher Anteil der Kandidaten erfolgreich sein würde. Zur Überraschung aller erhielten 52% der 3.800 Personen, die an der Prüfung teilgenommen hatten, eine E-Mail mit der Bestätigung, dass sie bestanden hatten. Einige Kandidaten gaben an, dass sie beim Verlassen des Prüfungssaals sicher waren, mehr als fünf Fragen falsch beantwortet zu haben, und waren erstaunt, als sie sahen, dass sie bestanden hatten. Die FIFA hat sich nicht offiziell zur Bestehensgrenze geäußert, sondern lediglich die Anzahl der erfolgreichen Kandidaten bestätigt. Die Bestehensquote variierte von Verband zu Verband, was möglicherweise auf Sprach- und Übersetzungsschwierigkeiten zurückzuführen ist. In einem nicht englisch, französisch oder spanisch sprechenden Land haben zum Beispiel nur 13 von 120 Kandidaten die Prüfung bestanden.

    Summary

    Die große Resonanz von Spielerberatern aus aller Welt, die zu diesem Blog beigetragen haben, unterstreicht die Bedeutung des ersten Durchgangs der neuen FIFA Spielervermittler-Prüfung. Sowohl die Kandidaten als auch die lizenzierten Spielervermittler waren sehr daran interessiert, ihre Meinung zu äußern und ihre Prüfungserfahrungen zu teilen. Dieses Feedback hilft nicht nur, die nächste Gruppe von Kandidaten für die bevorstehende Prüfung im September zu schulen, sondern liefert auch wertvolle Informationen für die FIFA und die Nationalverbände, um die Fairness und Durchführung der Prüfung zu verbessern. 

    Wir gratulieren denjenigen, die die Prüfung bestanden haben. Diejenigen, die sie nicht bestanden haben, haben noch genügend Zeit, sich auf die nächste Prüfung im September vorzubereiten und erfolgreich zu sein. 

    Diejenigen, die bereits planen, die nächste Prüfung abzulegen, können sich auf den Social Media-Plattformen der Erkut Sogut Academy über weitere Einzelheiten zu den Prüfungsvorbereitungskursen informieren. Hier gelangen sie direkt zum nächsten deutschsprachigen Vorbereitungsseminar in Frankfurt am Main: https://www.eventbrite.de/e/spielerberater-seminar-vorbereitung-zur-spielervermittler-prufung-tickets-618375105587